The Riot Club
2014 · 107 min · Director: Lone Scherfig
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
SPOILER: Alistair and Miles, both with aristocratic connections, start their first year at Oxford University though they are very different, Miles is down to earth and happy to have a girlfriend, Lauren, from a lower background whilst Alistair is a snob with aspirations to follow his uncle, a Tory MP. The common bond is that both become members of the Riot Club, a long established elite drinking club priding itself on hedonism and the belief that money can buy anything. Having been barred from most establishments in Oxford they have their annual dinner at the function room in a country pub, where their rowdy behavior angers other patrons though they reimburse Chris, the landlord. They hire a prostitute but she refuses to perform group sex, then one of them rings Lauren, whom they importune to Miles' horror. Getting progressively more drunk and ingesting drugs they start to trash the room and, when Chris comes to complain, Alistair savagely assaults him, landing him in hospital. Though shocked, none of the others do anything to stop him except Miles, who is attacked before ringing for an ambulance. The boys are all arrested but believing that the club is more important than the individual they agree not to give statements and suggest that Miles, as the newest club member, should take the blame for the attack on Chris.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
The Riot Club (2014) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Tension 30%, Disturbing 25%, Anger 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Tension30%
- Disturbing25%
- Anger20%
- Anxiety15%
- Confusion10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Tension, Disturbing, Anger. Genres: Thriller, Drama. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Tension, Disturbing and Anger. Its IMDb rating of 6.0/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 61/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Disturbing
- Tension
- Anger
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Disturbing | Tension | Anger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 40 % | 12 % | 10 % | 5 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Humor | 36 % | 11 % | 16 % | 6 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Humor | 38 % | 18 % | 27 % | 10 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Humor | 39 % | 21 % | 29 % | 13 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Humor | 39 % | 23 % | 25 % | 11 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Humor | 43 % | 31 % | 29 % | 11 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Disturbing | 41 % | 34 % | 31 % | 14 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Humor | 36 % | 28 % | 29 % | 16 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Humor | 38 % | 26 % | 29 % | 16 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Humor | 43 % | 30 % | 32 % | 18 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Disturbing | 51 % | 41 % | 40 % | 30 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Disturbing | 63 % | 56 % | 51 % | 46 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Disturbing | 70 % | 65 % | 61 % | 56 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 72′ | Disturbing | 76 % | 70 % | 69 % | 63 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Tension | 85 % | 78 % | 79 % | 65 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Disturbing | 90 % | 84 % | 83 % | 66 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Disturbing | 83 % | 74 % | 69 % | 61 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 94′ | Sadness | 70 % | 58 % | 49 % | 50 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 99′ | Disturbing | 65 % | 55 % | 38 % | 47 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 104′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Details
- Directed by
- Lone Scherfig
- Written by
- Laura Wade
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2014
- Runtime
- 107 min
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Tension
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





