Nonnas
2025 · 112 min · Director: Stephen Chbosky
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
After losing his beloved mother, a man risks everything to honor her by opening an Italian restaurant with actual grandmothers as the chefs.
Emotional fingerprint
Nonnas (2025) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Empathy 30%, Love 25%, Hope 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Empathy30%
- Love25%
- Hope20%
- Sadness15%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Empathy, Love, Hope. Genres: Comedy. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Empathy, Love and Hope. Its IMDb rating of 6.8/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 70/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Joy
- Hope
- Humor
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Joy | Hope | Humor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Joy | 58 % | 38 % | 12 % | 23 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Sadness | 59 % | 25 % | 14 % | 28 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Sadness | 54 % | 20 % | 23 % | 30 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Hope | 51 % | 24 % | 39 % | 30 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Hope | 54 % | 24 % | 43 % | 36 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Humor | 55 % | 28 % | 35 % | 45 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Joy | 58 % | 34 % | 35 % | 49 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Humor | 60 % | 29 % | 33 % | 49 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Sadness | 60 % | 18 % | 21 % | 35 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Sadness | 61 % | 18 % | 23 % | 21 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Hope | 63 % | 34 % | 43 % | 24 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Hope | 64 % | 49 % | 49 % | 34 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Joy | 64 % | 50 % | 36 % | 46 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Humor | 61 % | 35 % | 30 % | 41 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Sadness | 63 % | 14 % | 26 % | 21 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Sadness | 68 % | 19 % | 30 % | 16 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Joy | 72 % | 48 % | 48 % | 19 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Joy | 75 % | 64 % | 56 % | 18 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 104′ | Joy | 73 % | 65 % | 53 % | 20 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 109′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Dan McClane
Italian Partygoer
Bum
Vito
Maria
Vendor
Mr. Pionconne
Cousin Tammy
Gabriella
Older Gabriella
Details
- Directed by
- Stephen Chbosky
- Written by
- Liz Maccie, Jody Scaravella
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2025
- Runtime
- 112 min
- Country
- United States
- Genres
- Comedy
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Empathy
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
