The Lazarus Effect
2015 · 83 min · Director: David Gelb
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
*** SPOILER ALERT *** THE LAZARUS EFFECT follows a group of researchers led by Frank and his fiancé Zoe who've achieved the unimaginable - bringing the dead back to life. After a successful, yet unsanctioned, trial on a newly deceased animal, the team is ready to unveil their breakthrough to the world. When the dean of their university learns of their underground experiments, their project is unexpectedly shut down and their materials confiscated. Frank, Zoe and their team take matters into their own hands, launching a rogue attempt to recreate their experiment, during which things go terribly wrong and one of their own, Zoe, is horrifically killed. Fueled by terror and grief, Frank pushes them to do the unthinkable: attempt to resurrect their first human test subject. Initially, the procedure appears a success, but the team soon realizes something is wrong with Zoe. As her strange new persona reveals itself, the team quickly becomes stuck in a gruesome reality. They are no longer faced with the question of whether they can bring someone back to life- but rather, the wrath of her return.
Emotional fingerprint
The Lazarus Effect (2015) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Fear 35%, Disturbing 25%, Anxiety 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Fear35%
- Disturbing25%
- Anxiety20%
- Sadness10%
- Surprise10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Fear, Disturbing, Anxiety. Genres: Mystery, Horror, Sci-Fi. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Fear, Disturbing and Anxiety. Its IMDb rating of 5.2/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 57/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Fear
- Disturbing
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Fear
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Fear | Disturbing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Curiosity | 43 % | 26 % | 10 % | 18 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 6′ | Curiosity | 43 % | 23 % | 13 % | 15 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 10′ | Tension | 48 % | 35 % | 25 % | 21 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 44 % | 27 % | 28 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 46 % | 29 % | 33 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Tension | 59 % | 53 % | 33 % | 33 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Sadness | 61 % | 56 % | 26 % | 20 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Tension | 70 % | 66 % | 33 % | 23 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Tension | 76 % | 71 % | 39 % | 36 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Curiosity | 68 % | 60 % | 30 % | 39 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Curiosity | 63 % | 56 % | 35 % | 45 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Tension | 71 % | 66 % | 57 % | 60 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Fear | 78 % | 74 % | 69 % | 68 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Tension | 80 % | 78 % | 69 % | 71 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 60′ | Disturbing | 86 % | 84 % | 76 % | 79 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Tension | 88 % | 86 % | 79 % | 78 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Tension | 84 % | 84 % | 74 % | 69 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Tension | 79 % | 76 % | 68 % | 59 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Sadness | 72 % | 65 % | 57 % | 48 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Lawyer
Fireman
Burned Figure
Little Girl
Security Guard
Details
- Directed by
- David Gelb
- Written by
- Luke Dawson, Jeremy Slater
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2015
- Runtime
- 83 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Fear
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
