feeldb

Kathleen Madigan: Madigan Again

2013 · 64 min · Director: Jay Chapman ★ IMDb 7.3 · 526 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Kathleen Madigan drops in on Detroit to deliver material derived from time spent with her Irish Catholic Midwest family, eating random pills out of her mother's purse, touring Afghanistan, and her love of John Denver and the Lunesta butterfly.

Ask Kadri Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Kathleen Madigan: Madigan Again (2013) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 50%, Smile 20%, Joy 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

50%Humor
20%Smile
15%Joy
  1. Humor50%
  2. Smile20%
  3. Joy15%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Smile, Joy. Genres: Comedy. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Smile and Joy. Its IMDb rating of 7.3/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 69/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Humor

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Humor

Humor
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values.
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Follow the emotional intensity across the film; hatched intervals indicate limited subtitle evidence.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityHumor
2.5 %≈ 2′Humor64 %63 %
7.5 %≈ 5′Humor67 %67 %
12.5 %≈ 8′Humor70 %70 %
17.5 %≈ 11′Humor73 %73 %
22.5 %≈ 14′Humor75 %75 %
27.5 %≈ 18′Humor71 %70 %
32.5 %≈ 21′Humor68 %67 %
37.5 %≈ 24′Humor70 %70 %
42.5 %≈ 27′Humor74 %73 %
47.5 %≈ 30′Humor74 %73 %
52.5 %≈ 34′Humor72 %72 %
57.5 %≈ 37′Humor72 %72 %
62.5 %≈ 40′Humor73 %73 %
67.5 %≈ 43′Humor74 %74 %
72.5 %≈ 46′Humor73 %73 %
77.5 %≈ 50′Humor75 %74 %
82.5 %≈ 53′Humor76 %75 %
87.5 %≈ 56′Humor76 %75 %
92.5 %≈ 59′Humor75 %74 %
97.5 %≈ 62′Humor74 %72 %
Rags to riches

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Kathleen Madigan: Madigan Again. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Kathleen Madigan: Madigan Again — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

KM
Kathleen Madigan

Details

Directed by
Jay Chapman
Written by
Kathleen Madigan
Type
Movies
Released
2013
Runtime
64 min
Country
United States
Genres
Comedy
Ratings
★ IMDb 7.3 · 526 ratings
Feels mostly
Humor
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.