Spy
2015 · 120 min · Director: Paul Feig
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Susan Cooper is an unassuming, deskbound CIA analyst, and the unsung hero behind the Agency's most dangerous missions. But when her partner falls off the grid and another top agent is compromised, she volunteers to go deep undercover to infiltrate the world of a deadly arms dealer, and prevent a global crisis.
Emotional fingerprint
Spy (2015) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 35%, Excitement 25%, Surprise 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor35%
- Excitement25%
- Surprise15%
- Satisfaction15%
- Relief10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Excitement, Surprise. Genres: Comedy, Action. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Excitement and Surprise. Its IMDb rating of 7.0/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 71/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Tension
- Surprise
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Tension | Surprise |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Tension | 62 % | 48 % | 53 % | 33 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Relief | 56 % | 48 % | 36 % | 23 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Humor | 54 % | 43 % | 26 % | 20 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Tension | 57 % | 40 % | 33 % | 26 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Humor | 60 % | 51 % | 26 % | 25 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Humor | 60 % | 57 % | 25 % | 26 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Humor | 60 % | 51 % | 41 % | 32 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Tension | 61 % | 50 % | 51 % | 35 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Humor | 63 % | 55 % | 49 % | 34 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Humor | 61 % | 58 % | 43 % | 33 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Humor | 63 % | 60 % | 44 % | 34 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Humor | 66 % | 64 % | 49 % | 34 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Humor | 66 % | 65 % | 48 % | 31 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Humor | 65 % | 61 % | 49 % | 34 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Tension | 64 % | 55 % | 54 % | 36 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Humor | 59 % | 50 % | 51 % | 31 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 99′ | Humor | 60 % | 45 % | 55 % | 31 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 105′ | Tension | 70 % | 48 % | 64 % | 38 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 111′ | Relief | 69 % | 55 % | 46 % | 32 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 117′ | Humor | 60 % | 57 % | 20 % | 22 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Spy. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Sharon
Jaime the Gardener
DC French Waiter
Alan the Bartender
Details
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Also on
Availability varies by country
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
