Jack Reacher: Never Go Back
2016 · 118 min · Director: Edward Zwick
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
After accomplishing the assignment of dismantling a human trafficking organization, the former military and drifter Jack Reacher goes to Washington to invite his liaison, Major Susan Turner, to have dinner with him. However, he meets her substitute, Colonel Sam Morgan, who explains that Major Turner has been arrested and accused of espionage. Jack seeks out her veteran lawyer, Colonel Bob Moorcroft, who explains that Major Turner has also been accused of the murders of two soldiers in Afghanistan. Further, he also tells Jack he is being sued, accused by a woman of being the father of her fifteen year-old daughter, Samantha. When Moorcroft is murdered, Jack is accused of being the killer and sent to a prison. He sees that Turner and he have been framed and also that Turner will be killed by two assassins. However, he rescues her and they flee. Soon, they realize that there is a conspiracy involving military people from the army and a government contractor that is a powerful arms dealer. Jack also learns that Samantha is in danger and Turner and he rescue her. They decide to protect her since a skilled assassin is hunting them down while they try to find the motive of the conspiracy. Who can be trusted?
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Jack Reacher: Never Go Back (2016) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Excitement 30%, Tension 25%, Anxiety 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Excitement30%
- Tension25%
- Anxiety20%
- Satisfaction15%
- Empathy10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Excitement, Tension, Anxiety. Genres: Thriller, Drama, Action. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Excitement, Tension and Anxiety. Its IMDb rating of 6.2/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 64/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Curiosity
- Empathy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Curiosity | Empathy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 45 % | 56 % | 17 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Curiosity | 57 % | 49 % | 57 % | 24 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Tension | 63 % | 59 % | 55 % | 22 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Tension | 69 % | 68 % | 47 % | 21 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Tension | 76 % | 76 % | 40 % | 22 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Tension | 75 % | 74 % | 43 % | 17 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Curiosity | 65 % | 59 % | 46 % | 25 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Empathy | 59 % | 48 % | 38 % | 40 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Humor | 58 % | 51 % | 38 % | 35 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Tension | 60 % | 53 % | 42 % | 34 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Empathy | 63 % | 51 % | 36 % | 39 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Tension | 66 % | 55 % | 36 % | 39 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Empathy | 68 % | 54 % | 48 % | 50 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Curiosity | 73 % | 63 % | 54 % | 54 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Tension | 77 % | 74 % | 50 % | 38 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Tension | 79 % | 76 % | 44 % | 30 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 97′ | Tension | 86 % | 85 % | 30 % | 49 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 103′ | Tension | 88 % | 71 % | 17 % | 67 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 109′ | Relief | 81 % | 35 % | 15 % | 68 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 115′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Jack Reacher: Never Go Back. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Jack Reacher: Never Go Back — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Samantha
The Hunter
Smuggled Woman
Smuggled Woman
Smuggled Woman
Sgt. Leach
Col. Moorcroft
Passenger
Shop Owner
Cibelli
Details
- Directed by
- Edward Zwick
- Written by
- Edward Zwick, Richard Wenk, Marshall Herskovitz
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2016
- Runtime
- 118 min
- Country
- United States, China
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Excitement
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
-
Amazon Prime Video
Opens in a new tab
-
fuboTV
Opens in a new tab
-
Paramount Plus Premium
Opens in a new tab
-
Paramount Plus Essential
Opens in a new tab
-
Peacock Premium
Opens in a new tab
-
Paramount+ Amazon Channel
Opens in a new tab
-
Paramount+ Roku Premium Channel
Opens in a new tab
-
Amazon Prime Video with Ads
Opens in a new tab
-
Starz Apple TV channel
Opens in a new tab
-
Peacock Premium Plus
Opens in a new tab
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





