Emotional fingerprint
Fear, Inc. (2016) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Fear 35%, Tension 25%, Excitement 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Fear35%
- Tension25%
- Excitement20%
- Surprise10%
- Humor10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Fear, Tension, Excitement. Genres: Thriller, Comedy, Horror. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Fear, Tension and Excitement. Its IMDb rating of 5.6/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 60/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Surprise
- Fear
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Surprise
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Surprise | Fear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Tension | 68 % | 55 % | 28 % | 52 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 59 % | 31 % | 25 % | 29 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Humor | 53 % | 21 % | 23 % | 16 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Humor | 50 % | 29 % | 21 % | 19 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Humor | 48 % | 38 % | 21 % | 24 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Tension | 54 % | 49 % | 33 % | 32 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Surprise | 61 % | 57 % | 43 % | 39 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Tension | 65 % | 64 % | 40 % | 45 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Tension | 69 % | 69 % | 36 % | 51 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Tension | 71 % | 71 % | 35 % | 55 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Tension | 79 % | 78 % | 43 % | 65 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Disturbing | 85 % | 83 % | 49 % | 73 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Tension | 81 % | 78 % | 51 % | 63 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Surprise | 75 % | 70 % | 54 % | 46 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Tension | 73 % | 70 % | 43 % | 44 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Tension | 79 % | 78 % | 40 % | 56 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Tension | 86 % | 73 % | 60 % | 56 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Surprise | 85 % | 56 % | 76 % | 40 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 85′ | Surprise | 83 % | 55 % | 80 % | 38 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 90′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Fear, Inc.. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Ashleigh Davidson
Cat
Trisha Harrison
Details
- Directed by
- Vincent Masciale
- Written by
- Luke Barnett, Luke Barnett
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2016
- Runtime
- 92 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Fear
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
