feeldb

Misconduct

2016 · 106 min · Director: Shintaro Shimosawa, Shintaro Shimosawa ★ IMDb 5.3 · 19,275 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

An ambitious young lawyer is approached by an ex-lover who offers him all the evidence he needs to form a legal case against her husband, a powerful and ruthless executive of a large pharmaceutical company. The lawyer starts the legal proceedings and continues begins an affair with the woman. The lawyer's boss and the executive settle the case without going to court. The lawyer finds the woman dead in her apartment, and it appears someone is trying blackmail the executive. The lawyer leaves the body in the apartment, but a mysterious stranger moves the body to his house moments before the police raid. The stranger was employed by the lawyer's boss, to kill the lawyer's wife for the murder of the woman, because the lawyer's boss works for the executive. The lawyer kills the stranger, and he and his wife agree not to tell anyone about all the people they murdered.

Trailer for Misconduct

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Misconduct (2016) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Confusion 30%, Tension 25%, Anxiety 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Confusion, Tension, Anxiety. Genres: Drama, Mystery, Crime. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Confusion, Tension and Anxiety. Its IMDb rating of 5.3/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 56/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Tension
  • Curiosity
  • Disturbing

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Disturbing

Tension
Curiosity
Disturbing
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 13 %, then rises around 57 %, then peaks around 68 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityTensionCuriosityDisturbing
2.5 %≈ 3′Tension51 %48 %42 %18 %
7.5 %≈ 8′Tension50 %45 %41 %15 %
12.5 %≈ 13′Sadness46 %34 %41 %16 %
17.5 %≈ 19′Curiosity48 %34 %46 %26 %
22.5 %≈ 24′Curiosity51 %43 %46 %29 %
27.5 %≈ 29′Tension47 %45 %41 %20 %
32.5 %≈ 34′Tension49 %49 %43 %18 %
37.5 %≈ 40′Tension58 %54 %41 %34 %
42.5 %≈ 45′Disturbing61 %51 %36 %45 %
47.5 %≈ 50′Curiosity56 %50 %39 %33 %
52.5 %≈ 56′Tension59 %56 %46 %26 %
57.5 %≈ 61′Curiosity66 %63 %51 %39 %
62.5 %≈ 66′Tension75 %73 %49 %59 %
67.5 %≈ 72′Tension83 %80 %41 %70 %
72.5 %≈ 77′Tension77 %74 %38 %61 %
77.5 %≈ 82′Tension75 %71 %41 %56 %
82.5 %≈ 87′Tension82 %80 %50 %63 %
87.5 %≈ 93′Tension82 %76 %59 %61 %
92.5 %≈ 98′Curiosity75 %63 %63 %60 %
97.5 %≈ 103′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Glen Powell

Doug Fields

Alice Eve

Charlotte Cahill

Malin Akerman

Emily Hynes

Lee Byung-hun

The Accountant

Julia Stiles

Jane Clemente

Marcus Lyle Brown

Joe Bilson

SP
Skye P. Marshall

Hatty

Gregory Alan Williams

Richard Hill

JG
Jason Gibson

Graham

NM
Nathan Moore

Lawrence

JS
Julia Sandström

Jenny

SF
Sara Fletcher

911 Operator

AF
Alexandra Fatovich

Elizabeth

EB
Elizabeth Buzbee

Katy

MB
Milla Bjorn

Susie

Details

Directed by
Shintaro Shimosawa, Shintaro Shimosawa
Type
Movies
Released
2016
Runtime
106 min
Country
United States
Ratings
★ IMDb 5.3 · 19,275 ratings
Feels mostly
Confusion
Data updated

Where to watch

Also on

Availability varies by country

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.