Misconduct
2016 · 106 min · Director: Shintaro Shimosawa, Shintaro Shimosawa
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
An ambitious young lawyer is approached by an ex-lover who offers him all the evidence he needs to form a legal case against her husband, a powerful and ruthless executive of a large pharmaceutical company. The lawyer starts the legal proceedings and continues begins an affair with the woman. The lawyer's boss and the executive settle the case without going to court. The lawyer finds the woman dead in her apartment, and it appears someone is trying blackmail the executive. The lawyer leaves the body in the apartment, but a mysterious stranger moves the body to his house moments before the police raid. The stranger was employed by the lawyer's boss, to kill the lawyer's wife for the murder of the woman, because the lawyer's boss works for the executive. The lawyer kills the stranger, and he and his wife agree not to tell anyone about all the people they murdered.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Misconduct (2016) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Confusion 30%, Tension 25%, Anxiety 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Confusion30%
- Tension25%
- Anxiety20%
- Surprise15%
- Disturbing10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Confusion, Tension, Anxiety. Genres: Drama, Mystery, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Confusion, Tension and Anxiety. Its IMDb rating of 5.3/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 56/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Curiosity
- Disturbing
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Curiosity | Disturbing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Tension | 51 % | 48 % | 42 % | 18 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Tension | 50 % | 45 % | 41 % | 15 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Sadness | 46 % | 34 % | 41 % | 16 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Curiosity | 48 % | 34 % | 46 % | 26 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Curiosity | 51 % | 43 % | 46 % | 29 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Tension | 47 % | 45 % | 41 % | 20 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Tension | 49 % | 49 % | 43 % | 18 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Tension | 58 % | 54 % | 41 % | 34 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Disturbing | 61 % | 51 % | 36 % | 45 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 50 % | 39 % | 33 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Tension | 59 % | 56 % | 46 % | 26 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Curiosity | 66 % | 63 % | 51 % | 39 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Tension | 75 % | 73 % | 49 % | 59 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 72′ | Tension | 83 % | 80 % | 41 % | 70 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Tension | 77 % | 74 % | 38 % | 61 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Tension | 75 % | 71 % | 41 % | 56 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Tension | 82 % | 80 % | 50 % | 63 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Tension | 82 % | 76 % | 59 % | 61 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Curiosity | 75 % | 63 % | 63 % | 60 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 103′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Hatty
Graham
Lawrence
Jenny
911 Operator
Elizabeth
Katy
Susie
Details
- Directed by
- Shintaro Shimosawa, Shintaro Shimosawa
- Written by
- Adam Mason, Simon Boyes
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2016
- Runtime
- 106 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Confusion
- Data updated
Where to watch
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





