Pants on Fire
2014 · 85 min · Director: Jonathan A. Rosenbaum
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Chaos strikes when a boy's (Bradley Steven Perry) lies magically become real, including tall tales of aliens, a possessive girlfriend and an imaginary buddy (Tyrel Jackson Williams).
Emotional fingerprint
Pants on Fire (2014) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 40%, Surprise 20%, Empathy 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Surprise, Empathy. Genres: Comedy, Family. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Surprise and Empathy. Its IMDb rating of 5.1/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 59/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Relief
- Surprise
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Surprise
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sympathy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Relief | Surprise |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 56 % | 56 % | 2 % | 14 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 6′ | Humor | 58 % | 56 % | 7 % | 17 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Humor | 57 % | 55 % | 10 % | 21 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Humor | 56 % | 52 % | 5 % | 28 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Surprise | 61 % | 55 % | 0 % | 43 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Humor | 68 % | 63 % | 2 % | 44 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Humor | 66 % | 65 % | 5 % | 30 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Humor | 62 % | 62 % | 4 % | 27 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Humor | 61 % | 59 % | 4 % | 27 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Humor | 55 % | 51 % | 3 % | 19 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Humor | 53 % | 49 % | 4 % | 17 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Humor | 55 % | 50 % | 8 % | 18 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Humor | 56 % | 43 % | 11 % | 21 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Tension | 64 % | 46 % | 19 % | 29 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Tension | 70 % | 45 % | 27 % | 28 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Sympathy | 65 % | 30 % | 22 % | 26 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Sympathy | 62 % | 27 % | 21 % | 25 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Sympathy | 67 % | 42 % | 37 % | 37 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 79′ | Surprise | 72 % | 55 % | 53 % | 49 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Humor | 70 % | 58 % | 54 % | 37 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Pants on Fire. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Kyle
Ryan
Lisa
Kiljum Daringwood Jr
Lance
Details
- Directed by
- Jonathan A. Rosenbaum
- Written by
- Jed Elinoff, Scott Thomas, Alex Cramer, Alex Cramer
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2014
- Runtime
- 85 min
- Country
- Canada
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
