Cosmos
2019 · 128 min · Director: Elliot Weaver, Zander Weaver
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
THUMP. THUMP. THUMP. A clean, crisp signal cuts through the static and noise of space. When you've spent years listening to the sounds of the cosmos, you get used to hearing weirdness, but Mike Webster knows this is no ordinary signal. It's not a pulsar or a black hole, it's not interference, it's something different, something logical, something with purpose. As part of a three man astronomy team crammed into a car kitted out with all manner of stellar studying equipment, Mike is reluctant to jump to grand conclusions about his little discovery, and secretly transmits a response to the signal. Pointless, he knows, even if it was from intelligent life, it'd take thousands of years for his response to reach them and thousands more for them to reply. But when he does receive a response just hours later, his scientific understanding, and that of his fellow scientists, is shaken. Could this be genuine? Is there more to decipher from the message? How could a reply come so quickly? Before long, the team face the challenge of documenting their discovery, proving its authenticity and sharing it with the world before it is lost forever. Three astronomers may just have inadvertently stumbled across Mankind's greatest discovery: proof of alien life.
Emotional fingerprint
Cosmos (2019) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Awe 35%, Curiosity 25%, Inspiration 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Awe35%
- Curiosity25%
- Inspiration20%
- Nostalgia10%
- Relief10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Awe, Curiosity, Inspiration. Genres: Mystery, Adventure, Sci-Fi. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Awe, Curiosity and Inspiration. Its IMDb rating of 6.0/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 63/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Curiosity
- Awe
- Tension
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Awe
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Curiosity | Awe | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 29 % | 24 % | 6 % | 7 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 10′ | Humor | 33 % | 21 % | 3 % | 8 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Humor | 36 % | 20 % | 3 % | 8 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Curiosity | 39 % | 31 % | 14 % | 13 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Curiosity | 45 % | 45 % | 23 % | 23 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Curiosity | 52 % | 43 % | 17 % | 28 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Empathy | 54 % | 32 % | 6 % | 26 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Empathy | 59 % | 41 % | 16 % | 30 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 54′ | Curiosity | 71 % | 68 % | 40 % | 53 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Curiosity | 77 % | 80 % | 45 % | 67 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Curiosity | 76 % | 76 % | 39 % | 69 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Tension | 77 % | 64 % | 44 % | 68 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Empathy | 74 % | 44 % | 38 % | 49 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Empathy | 75 % | 44 % | 30 % | 41 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Curiosity | 81 % | 69 % | 52 % | 52 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 99′ | Awe | 87 % | 84 % | 80 % | 55 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 106′ | Awe | 90 % | 70 % | 69 % | 67 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 112′ | Tension | 91 % | 46 % | 43 % | 85 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 118′ | Tension | 92 % | 41 % | 54 % | 70 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 125′ | Awe | 93 % | 48 % | 80 % | 38 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Cosmos. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Details
- Directed by
- Elliot Weaver, Zander Weaver
- Written by
- Elliot Weaver, Zander Weaver
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2019
- Runtime
- 128 min
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Awe
- Data updated
Where to watch
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
