Emotional fingerprint
Chongqing Hot Pot (2016) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Excitement 30%, Humor 25%, Tension 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Excitement30%
- Humor25%
- Tension20%
- Surprise15%
- Relief10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Excitement, Humor, Tension. Genres: Thriller, Comedy, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Excitement, Humor and Tension. Its IMDb rating of 6.5/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 66/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Love
- Relief
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Love | Relief |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Tension | 42 % | 38 % | 0 % | 0 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Humor | 46 % | 40 % | 0 % | 1 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Tension | 49 % | 41 % | 1 % | 3 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Humor | 45 % | 33 % | 8 % | 3 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Humor | 44 % | 28 % | 18 % | 6 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Tension | 50 % | 40 % | 20 % | 9 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Tension | 55 % | 49 % | 18 % | 5 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Humor | 56 % | 50 % | 15 % | 3 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Tension | 63 % | 57 % | 10 % | 1 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Empathy | 69 % | 64 % | 13 % | 0 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Tension | 75 % | 73 % | 21 % | 0 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Tension | 84 % | 84 % | 24 % | 1 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Tension | 81 % | 80 % | 15 % | 3 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Tension | 71 % | 66 % | 18 % | 11 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Love | 70 % | 62 % | 37 % | 27 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 85′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 90′ | Relief | 75 % | 5 % | 65 % | 65 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 95′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Chongqing Hot Pot. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Wang Pingchuan/Four Eyes
Pigsy
Sha Seng/Monk Sandy
Brother QI
Manager Zhang
Young Yu Xiaohui
Details
- Directed by
- Qing Yang, Yang Qing
- Written by
- Qing Yang, Enming Zhang, Shimao Zhang, Yang Qing
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2016
- Runtime
- 97 min
- Country
- China
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Excitement
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
