Disappearance at Clifton Hill
2019 · 100 min · Director: Albert Shin
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
When Abby (Tuppence Middleton) returns to her hometown of Niagara Falls after her mother dies, she becomes obsessed with a fragmented memory from her childhood, a kidnapping she believes she was witness to. She is reunited with her estranged younger sister, Laure (Hannah Gross), and they attempt to settle their mother's estate involving the sale of the family motel, but Abby's compulsive desire to reconcile her past grows increasingly out of control. Albert Shin's latest is an intense and taut psychological thriller that exposes the seedy underbelly of structural systems through the point of view of its dynamic female protagonists. Middleton delivers a stellar and complex performance as a woman obsessed with her troubled past while trying to uncover a crime to which she's convinced she was an accomplice. Shin and co-writer James Schultz craft a sharp, suspenseful drama, equipped with twists and turns, culminating with a climax that will leave you thinking for days.
Emotional fingerprint
Disappearance at Clifton Hill (2019) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Anxiety 35%, Confusion 25%, Tension 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Anxiety35%
- Confusion25%
- Tension20%
- Sadness10%
- Disturbing10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Anxiety, Confusion, Tension. Genres: Thriller, Drama, Mystery. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Anxiety, Confusion and Tension. Its IMDb rating of 5.4/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 59/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Curiosity
- Tension
- Disturbing
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Confusion
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Curiosity | Tension | Disturbing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Tension | 64 % | 42 % | 58 % | 50 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Sadness | 45 % | 30 % | 34 % | 24 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Curiosity | 33 % | 25 % | 19 % | 8 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Curiosity | 41 % | 38 % | 28 % | 10 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Curiosity | 52 % | 52 % | 36 % | 14 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 59 % | 38 % | 16 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Curiosity | 59 % | 64 % | 40 % | 23 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Curiosity | 66 % | 69 % | 49 % | 39 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Curiosity | 71 % | 68 % | 60 % | 55 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Tension | 68 % | 65 % | 61 % | 51 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Curiosity | 68 % | 70 % | 60 % | 46 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Curiosity | 73 % | 74 % | 65 % | 51 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Curiosity | 63 % | 63 % | 56 % | 40 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Curiosity | 55 % | 55 % | 48 % | 30 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Curiosity | 70 % | 64 % | 61 % | 50 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Disturbing | 81 % | 65 % | 70 % | 64 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Confusion | 77 % | 61 % | 69 % | 49 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Tension | 76 % | 66 % | 65 % | 49 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Disturbing | 78 % | 70 % | 53 % | 65 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Disappearance at Clifton Hill. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Marcus
Charles Lake II
US Border Agent
US Marshall
Bartender
Flying Saucer Waitress
Details
- Directed by
- Albert Shin
- Written by
- Albert Shin, James Schultz
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2019
- Runtime
- 100 min
- Country
- Canada
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Anxiety
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
