The Laws of Thermodynamics
2018 · 100 min · Director: Mateo Gil
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
In Barcelona (Catalonia, northeast to Spain), Manel is a neurotic scientist obsessed with the idea that the three laws of thermodynamics rules the daily life of all people, writing a thesis about it while he works as teacher assistant in the university. His happy life with his long-time girlfriend Raquel ends the day that casually he crashes in the street at the same time with Elena (a sexy and famous top model), Eva (a beauty young lawyer who recently has opened her own law firm) and his friend Pablo (an Argentinian CEO of an advertising company and an unstoppable womanizer). After the incident, Manel breaks up with Raquel and he starts dating with Elena, at the same time that Pablo dates Eva. Meanwhile Pablo and Eva's relation is based only in casual sex without engagement, Manel and Elena lives an idyllic love story, but when it starts to give signals to worse, Manel's neurosis frustrates Elena as well as his compulsive behaviors, in his belief that all is by cause of the thermodynamics. Breaking up with him, Eva leaves Manel, and this one passes the time trying to recover her while Pablo, after to have an accident falling from a double-decker bus in a party, tries to recover Eva, who broken up him after to make a threesome they did with another girl. Interspersed throughout all movie with talking of real scientists whose explain all about science, the laws of thermodynamics that rule the universe from the Big Bang and the scientists whose discovered it along the history, Pablo questions himself after to realize Eva's pregnant, trying to know if he can be husband and family father, and Manel questions himself if he can restore his previous life with Elena, or if the thermodynamics will make impossible the reconciliation.
Emotional fingerprint
The Laws of Thermodynamics (2018) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 35%, Confusion 25%, Love 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor35%
- Confusion25%
- Love20%
- Anxiety10%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Confusion, Love. Genres: Comedy. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Confusion and Love. Its IMDb rating of 6.0/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 64/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Love
- Humor
- Sadness
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Love | Humor | Sadness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 50 % | 7 % | 28 % | 15 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Sadness | 50 % | 18 % | 31 % | 23 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Humor | 53 % | 30 % | 43 % | 15 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Humor | 56 % | 40 % | 49 % | 9 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Love | 60 % | 52 % | 41 % | 6 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Love | 61 % | 57 % | 34 % | 6 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Love | 56 % | 41 % | 30 % | 23 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Sadness | 55 % | 25 % | 29 % | 35 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Tension | 59 % | 23 % | 39 % | 29 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Humor | 57 % | 18 % | 45 % | 28 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Sadness | 56 % | 18 % | 40 % | 34 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Tension | 57 % | 24 % | 38 % | 36 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Sadness | 57 % | 26 % | 31 % | 39 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Tension | 60 % | 31 % | 25 % | 43 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Sadness | 60 % | 34 % | 34 % | 43 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Humor | 61 % | 29 % | 39 % | 43 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Sadness | 68 % | 19 % | 28 % | 55 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Sadness | 65 % | 19 % | 29 % | 55 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Humor | 58 % | 30 % | 42 % | 38 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about The Laws of Thermodynamics. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Transeúnte
Student
Alumno 1
Camarero
Chica Orgullo
Enfermera
Details
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
