feeldb

HyperNormalisation

2016 · 167 min · Director: Adam Curtis ★ IMDb 8.2 · 8,408 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

HyperNormalisation tells the extraordinary story of how we got to this strange time of great uncertainty and confusion - where those who are supposed to be in power are paralysed - and have no idea what to do. And, where events keep happening that seem inexplicable and out of control - from Donald Trump to Brexit, the War in Syria, the endless migrant crisis, and random bomb attacks. It explains not only why these chaotic events are happening - but also why we, and our politicians, cannot understand them. The film shows that what has happened is that all of us in the West - not just the politicians and the journalists and the experts, but we ourselves - have retreated into a simplified, and often completely fake version of the world. But because it is all around us, we accept it as normal. From BBCiPlayer

Ask Kadri

Trailer for HyperNormalisation

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

HyperNormalisation (2016) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Confusion 32%, Anxiety 25%, Disturbing 18%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

  1. Awe10%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Confusion, Anxiety, Disturbing. Genres: Documentary. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Confusion, Anxiety and Disturbing. Its IMDb rating of 8.2/10 suggests a strong audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 74/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Disturbing
  • Curiosity
  • Anxiety

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Disturbing

Dominant emotion: Anxiety

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Confusion

Disturbing
Curiosity
Anxiety
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values.
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 33 %, then peaks around 63 %, then peaks around 98 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityDisturbingCuriosityAnxiety
2.5 %≈ 4′Curiosity58 %47 %62 %43 %
7.5 %≈ 13′Curiosity58 %50 %57 %41 %
12.5 %≈ 21′Curiosity63 %59 %53 %46 %
17.5 %≈ 29′Disturbing75 %73 %48 %59 %
22.5 %≈ 38′Disturbing73 %66 %50 %53 %
27.5 %≈ 46′Curiosity56 %41 %60 %31 %
32.5 %≈ 54′Curiosity53 %39 %63 %31 %
37.5 %≈ 63′Curiosity61 %48 %61 %44 %
42.5 %≈ 71′Curiosity61 %41 %66 %44 %
47.5 %≈ 79′Curiosity55 %36 %69 %39 %
52.5 %≈ 88′Curiosity61 %50 %61 %45 %
57.5 %≈ 96′Disturbing77 %73 %50 %63 %
62.5 %≈ 104′Disturbing86 %83 %46 %76 %
67.5 %≈ 113′Anxiety80 %74 %51 %71 %
72.5 %≈ 121′Curiosity65 %54 %57 %50 %
77.5 %≈ 129′Curiosity60 %46 %57 %39 %
82.5 %≈ 138′Sadness66 %56 %55 %46 %
87.5 %≈ 146′Confusion73 %66 %55 %56 %
92.5 %≈ 154′Disturbing78 %74 %49 %64 %
97.5 %≈ 163′Disturbing79 %77 %40 %68 %
Icarus

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about HyperNormalisation. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about HyperNormalisation — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

AC
Adam Curtis

Donald Trump

Self (archive footage)

VP
Vladimir Putin

VP
Vladimir Putin

Self (archive footage)

Ronald Reagan

Self (archive footage)

HK
Henry Kissinger

Self (archive footage)

GB
Gordon Brown

Self (archive footage)

Jane Fonda

Self (archive footage)

IT
Ivana Trump

Self (archive footage)

BN
Benjamin Netanyahu

Self (archive footage)

TB
Tony Blair

Self (archive footage)

George W. Bush

Self (archive footage)

Barack Obama

Self (archive footage)

DC
David Cameron

Self (archive footage)

NF
Nigel Farage

Self (archive footage)

Bill Clinton

Self (archive footage)

HC
Hillary Clinton

Self (archive footage)

MG
Muammar Gaddafi

Self (archive footage)

VG
Victor Gotbaum

Self (archive footage)

RK
Ruhollah Khomeini

Self (archive footage)

TL
Timothy Leary

Self (archive footage)

Details

Directed by
Adam Curtis
Written by
Adam Curtis
Type
Movies
Released
2016
Runtime
167 min
Country
United Kingdom
Ratings
★ IMDb 8.2 · 8,408 ratings
Feels mostly
Confusion
Data updated

Where to watch

Also on

Availability varies by country

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.