Ex Libris
2017 · 205 min · Director: Frederick Wiseman
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A look within the walls of the New York Public Library.
Emotional fingerprint
Ex Libris (2017) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Awe 30%, Curiosity 25%, Nostalgia 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Awe30%
- Curiosity25%
- Nostalgia20%
- Satisfaction15%
- Joy10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Awe, Curiosity, Nostalgia. Genres: Documentary. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Awe, Curiosity and Nostalgia. Its IMDb rating of 7.4/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 69/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Curiosity
- Inspiration
- Empathy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Inspiration
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Curiosity | Inspiration | Empathy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 5′ | Curiosity | 40 % | 38 % | 20 % | 18 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Curiosity | 40 % | 37 % | 26 % | 19 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 26′ | Curiosity | 38 % | 35 % | 30 % | 18 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Inspiration | 37 % | 36 % | 28 % | 16 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Curiosity | 39 % | 40 % | 23 % | 13 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Curiosity | 41 % | 40 % | 21 % | 11 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Humor | 40 % | 35 % | 24 % | 17 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Empathy | 36 % | 31 % | 23 % | 22 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Curiosity | 33 % | 30 % | 22 % | 22 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 97′ | Curiosity | 35 % | 32 % | 20 % | 25 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 108′ | Curiosity | 36 % | 33 % | 17 % | 24 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 118′ | Curiosity | 34 % | 31 % | 21 % | 17 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 128′ | Inspiration | 36 % | 31 % | 31 % | 19 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 138′ | Inspiration | 40 % | 35 % | 32 % | 22 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 149′ | Curiosity | 39 % | 37 % | 24 % | 16 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 159′ | Curiosity | 36 % | 35 % | 21 % | 12 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 169′ | Curiosity | 33 % | 32 % | 22 % | 14 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 179′ | Curiosity | 37 % | 32 % | 25 % | 25 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 190′ | Inspiration | 41 % | 32 % | 30 % | 33 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 200′ | Curiosity | 41 % | 34 % | 28 % | 30 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Ex Libris. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Self
Self
Details
- Directed by
- Frederick Wiseman
- Written by
- Frederick Wiseman
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2017
- Runtime
- 205 min
- Country
- United States
- Genres
- Documentary
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Awe
- Data updated
Where to watch
Data: JustWatch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
