School of Life
2017 · 116 min · Director: Nicolas Vanier
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Paris 1930. Paul always had only one and the same horizon: the high walls of the orphanage, a severe building on the outskirts of Paris. Entrusted to a cheerful lady of the countryside, Celestine and her husband, Borel, the somewhat rigid gamekeeper of a vast estate in Sologne, the child of the cities, recalcitrant and stubborn, arrives in a mysterious and worrying world, that of a sovereign and wild region. The immense forest, the misty ponds, the moors and the fields, everything here belongs to the Count of the Comte de La Salle. Fresnaye, a taciturn widower who lives alone in his mansion. The Count tolerates poachers on the estate, but Borel is relentlessly hunting them down and hounding the most cunning and elusive of them, Totoche. In the heart of the fairytale Sologne, next to the poacher, a great nature lover, Paul will learn about life but also the forest and its secrets. An even heavier secret weighs on the estate, because Paul did not come here by chance.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
School of Life (2017) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Empathy 30%, Inspiration 25%, Hope 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Empathy30%
- Inspiration25%
- Hope20%
- Nostalgia15%
- Sadness10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Empathy, Inspiration, Hope. Genres: Comedy, Drama, Family. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Empathy, Inspiration and Hope. Its IMDb rating of 6.9/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 68/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Empathy
- Sadness
- Relief
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Empathy | Sadness | Relief |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Empathy | 43 % | 43 % | 32 % | 7 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Empathy | 50 % | 43 % | 26 % | 16 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Relief | 53 % | 34 % | 14 % | 26 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Humor | 46 % | 23 % | 6 % | 21 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 26′ | Humor | 46 % | 25 % | 15 % | 11 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Sadness | 50 % | 40 % | 31 % | 5 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Empathy | 49 % | 41 % | 26 % | 9 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Humor | 49 % | 30 % | 10 % | 16 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Humor | 49 % | 25 % | 8 % | 14 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Tension | 46 % | 26 % | 10 % | 15 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Humor | 46 % | 31 % | 16 % | 24 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Sadness | 48 % | 39 % | 29 % | 24 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Humor | 50 % | 38 % | 26 % | 14 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Tension | 60 % | 33 % | 13 % | 18 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Relief | 69 % | 40 % | 20 % | 29 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 90′ | Sadness | 73 % | 59 % | 50 % | 26 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 96′ | Sadness | 76 % | 69 % | 69 % | 21 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 102′ | Sadness | 75 % | 59 % | 57 % | 28 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 107′ | Relief | 73 % | 50 % | 40 % | 47 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 113′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Icarus
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about School of Life. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about School of Life — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Bertrand
Bella
Montaine
Armand
Florence
Gypsy granny
Madeleine
Gendarme
Notary
Orphanage director
Grouchy guest
Details
- Directed by
- Nicolas Vanier
- Written by
- Jérôme Tonnerre, Nicolas Vanier
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2017
- Runtime
- 116 min
- Country
- France
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Empathy
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Data: JustWatch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.




