Chasing Coral
2017 · 93 min · Director: Jeff Orlowski-Yang, Jeff Orlowski
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Coral reefs around the world are vanishing at an unprecedented rate. A team of divers, photographers and scientists set out on a thrilling ocean adventure to discover why and to reveal the underwater mystery to the world.
Emotional fingerprint
Chasing Coral (2017) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Awe 30%, Empathy 25%, Sadness 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Awe30%
- Empathy25%
- Sadness20%
- Inspiration15%
- Hope10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Awe, Empathy, Sadness. Genres: Documentary. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Awe, Empathy and Sadness. Its IMDb rating of 8.0/10 suggests a strong audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 73/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Sadness
- Hope
- Awe
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Awe
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Sadness | Hope | Awe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Awe | 55 % | 5 % | 13 % | 52 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Curiosity | 55 % | 16 % | 11 % | 50 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Awe | 63 % | 35 % | 8 % | 50 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Sadness | 64 % | 49 % | 10 % | 33 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Sadness | 56 % | 39 % | 19 % | 20 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 26′ | Curiosity | 53 % | 21 % | 23 % | 23 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Tension | 54 % | 20 % | 28 % | 20 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Hope | 56 % | 15 % | 33 % | 30 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Awe | 60 % | 16 % | 31 % | 48 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Awe | 63 % | 34 % | 27 % | 40 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Tension | 60 % | 38 % | 25 % | 24 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Tension | 61 % | 40 % | 21 % | 32 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Sadness | 74 % | 63 % | 10 % | 40 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Sadness | 84 % | 79 % | 4 % | 23 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Sadness | 80 % | 75 % | 18 % | 9 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 72′ | Sadness | 76 % | 73 % | 35 % | 8 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Sadness | 79 % | 75 % | 44 % | 10 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Hope | 76 % | 60 % | 59 % | 11 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Hope | 72 % | 38 % | 72 % | 8 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Chasing Coral. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Himself - Scientific Advisor
Herself - Scientific Advisor
Himself - Additional Featured Scientist
Himself - Chief Scientific Advisor
Herself - Scientific Advisor
Himself - Scientific Advisor
Himself
Himself - Additional Featured Scientist
Himself - Scientific Advisor
Himself - Additional Featured Scientist
Himself
Himself - Additional Featured Scientist
Details
- Directed by
- Jeff Orlowski-Yang, Jeff Orlowski
- Written by
- Jeff Orlowski-Yang, Vickie Curtis, Davis Coombe, Jeff Orlowski
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2017
- Runtime
- 93 min
- Country
- United States
- Genres
- Documentary
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Awe
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
