Stockholm
2018 · 92 min · Director: Robert Budreau
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A semi-fictional account, including most of the names of the players being changed, of the event that resulted in the creation of the term Stockholm Syndrome to describe people who feel empathy and sometimes more for their captor(s) is presented. In 1973, a lone armed man, thought to be American, storms the downtown Stockholm branch of Kreditbanken. Ultimately the authorities, led by Chief of Police Mattsson learn of his at-gunpoint demand: $1 million US, the release of convicted bank robber and murderer Gunnar Sorensson, and a Mustang Boss 302 like the one Steve McQueen drove in Bullitt (1968) as a getaway vehicle for the two of them. By the time Mattsson gets Sorensson to the bank - unknown to the gunman, who is thought to be well known robber Kaj Hansson, Sorenson having made a plea deal with Mattsson for his cooperation against the gunman - there are three hostages at the bank, all the others that were in the bank at the time let go. Arguably the most lucid of the three is bank clerk Bianca Lind, a wife and mother of two preschool aged children. Ultimately she is able to figure out that the gunman is not Hansson as Mattsson suspects, but rather Lars Nystrom, what she knowing of his past crimes chief being his humane treatment of people he held at gunpoint. Beyond what Sorensson decides to do with his ultimate goal not to go back to prison, what happens largely depends on Lind, who begins to trust Nystrom more than either Mattsson or Prime Minister Olof Palme whose actions and decisions she believes from what she can see are more of a potential physical detriment to her and her fellow two hostages than that of Nystrom.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Stockholm (2018) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Anxiety 25%, Surprise 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Anxiety, Surprise. Genres: Comedy, Crime, Biography. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Anxiety and Surprise. Its IMDb rating of 6.1/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 63/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Empathy
- Sadness
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Empathy | Sadness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Tension | 48 % | 42 % | 22 % | 12 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Tension | 59 % | 56 % | 24 % | 8 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Tension | 64 % | 63 % | 31 % | 10 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Tension | 60 % | 56 % | 41 % | 16 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Tension | 61 % | 57 % | 41 % | 15 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Tension | 65 % | 63 % | 35 % | 15 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Tension | 59 % | 50 % | 36 % | 23 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Empathy | 53 % | 34 % | 46 % | 32 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Empathy | 60 % | 44 % | 54 % | 35 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Tension | 74 % | 68 % | 54 % | 33 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Tension | 76 % | 73 % | 48 % | 30 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Tension | 65 % | 60 % | 36 % | 19 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Humor | 61 % | 57 % | 31 % | 11 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Tension | 68 % | 65 % | 39 % | 21 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Tension | 71 % | 69 % | 48 % | 31 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Tension | 75 % | 73 % | 45 % | 25 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Tension | 79 % | 76 % | 41 % | 19 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Tension | 80 % | 69 % | 49 % | 28 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 85′ | Relief | 69 % | 38 % | 46 % | 39 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 90′ | Sadness | 53 % | 10 % | 32 % | 43 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Vincent
Bank Manager
Old Lady in Bank
Bank Employee
Injured Lady Bank Customer
Office Photographer
Sniper
Volunteer
Bianca's Daughter
Details
- Directed by
- Robert Budreau
- Written by
- Daniel Lang, Robert Budreau, James Luscombe
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2018
- Runtime
- 92 min
- Country
- Canada, United States, Sweden
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Free
Also on
Availability varies by country
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





