Dead Over Heels: An Aurora Teagarden Mystery
2017 · 84 min · Director: Terry Ingram
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
In Lawrenceton, librarian Aurora Teagarden - Ro to her friends - and her best friend, newspaper reporter Sally Allison, are in Ro's yard one winter day when a body flies out of a single engine airplane and lands dead on the ground, only feet from them. The victim is Lawrenceton Chief of Police, Frederick Burns, who Ro saw only yesterday, when he asked of the whereabouts of Ro's boyfriend, business executive and ex-CIA Martin Bartell, to who he wanted to speak about some undisclosed issue which Captain Burns warned Ro, a real murders buff who has often insinuated herself in murder cases in town, to stay out of. Captain Burns is survived by his wife, Bess Burns, the sister of Ro's officious boss, Lillian Tibbett. Detective Lynn Smith, the senior detective on the police force, is leading the murder investigation and is Acting Police Chief, the latter appointment, protocol, which is to the consternation of Detective Pete Lambert, who feels he is senior detective, he only having recently returned to Lawrenceton after a stint working in Seattle. Despite Lynn not appointing him to the case, Lambert is determined to solve the murder to make a name for himself in the eyes of Mayor Sternholz, who will be appointing the next Chief. Lambert seems a little too eager to pin the murder on Martin. Against Ro's wants, the murder also becomes the topic of the day among her real murders discussion club, as many citizens are concerned that the murder of their police chief could lead to pandemonium in town and a risk to their own safety. Regardless, Ro can't help but try to figure out the murder herself, which would help if she can find out about what Captain Burns wanted to speak to Martin. Another person factoring into the unofficial investigation is Tim Prentiss, Martin's former CIA colleague new to town, he with who Ro would like to see a future with Sally.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Dead Over Heels: An Aurora Teagarden Mystery (2017) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Curiosity 30%, Tension 25%, Humor 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Curiosity30%
- Tension25%
- Humor15%
- Satisfaction15%
- Confusion15%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Curiosity, Tension, Humor. Genres: Drama, Mystery, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Curiosity, Tension and Humor. Its IMDb rating of 6.8/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 66/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Curiosity
- Tension
- Surprise
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Surprise
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Curiosity | Tension | Surprise |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Surprise | 68 % | 57 % | 50 % | 58 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 6′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 54 % | 40 % | 34 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Curiosity | 48 % | 51 % | 31 % | 15 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Curiosity | 53 % | 59 % | 38 % | 16 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Curiosity | 57 % | 61 % | 49 % | 20 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 54 % | 46 % | 23 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Curiosity | 49 % | 53 % | 33 % | 25 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Curiosity | 46 % | 54 % | 25 % | 21 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Curiosity | 45 % | 53 % | 28 % | 16 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Curiosity | 50 % | 53 % | 36 % | 16 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Tension | 55 % | 50 % | 45 % | 19 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Curiosity | 53 % | 53 % | 43 % | 18 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 60 % | 43 % | 23 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Curiosity | 61 % | 64 % | 54 % | 34 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Curiosity | 64 % | 68 % | 59 % | 33 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Curiosity | 64 % | 71 % | 59 % | 28 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Curiosity | 70 % | 71 % | 66 % | 30 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Tension | 77 % | 68 % | 76 % | 39 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Tension | 76 % | 53 % | 61 % | 41 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Relief | 70 % | 32 % | 30 % | 32 % |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Dead Over Heels: An Aurora Teagarden Mystery. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Kadri
Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Dead Over Heels: An Aurora Teagarden Mystery — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.
Premise onlyAfterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Bess Burns
Details
- Directed by
- Terry Ingram
- Written by
- Charlaine Harris, Shelley Evans
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2017
- Runtime
- 84 min
- Country
- Canada
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Curiosity
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





