feeldb

Perfect Bid: The Contestant Who Knew Too Much

2017 · 72 min · Director: C.J. Wallis, CJ Wallis ★ IMDb 6.5 · 3,358 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Winner of "Best Documentary" at the Orlando FIlm Festival, "Perfect Bid" explores how Slauson became adept at recording and memorizing prices of products featured on the show since its inception in 1972, culminating in him helping a contestant place a perfect bid during a 2008 Showcase, and ending in one of the biggest controversies in game show history as covered by TIME Magazine, Esquire, TMZ and more. Upon seeing a rough cut, Roger Dobkowitz, 5 time Emmy winner and 36-year producer of the show, along with television legend, Bob Barker, both commended Wallis' workmanship, and gave of their time in support of the project by participating in interview sessions and providing invaluable context for the film. "I think this wonderful documentary has a big chance of breaking away from all the other documentaries that come out each year. I am happy someone is recognizing the dedication of our fans," said Dobkowitz. "Ted Slauson is a loyal friend and true. People like that are the reason I didn't have to work for a living....its the least I could do" - Bob Barker.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Perfect Bid: The Contestant Who Knew Too Much

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Perfect Bid: The Contestant Who Knew Too Much (2017) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Curiosity 30%, Excitement 25%, Surprise 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Curiosity, Excitement, Surprise. Genres: History, Documentary. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Curiosity, Excitement and Surprise. Its IMDb rating of 6.5/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 67/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Curiosity
  • Joy
  • Nostalgia

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Nostalgia

Dominant emotion: Humor

Dominant emotion: Joy

Curiosity
Joy
Nostalgia
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values.
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then rises around 63 %, then peaks around 88 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityCuriosityJoyNostalgia
2.5 %≈ 2′Curiosity37 %38 %16 %27 %
7.5 %≈ 5′Curiosity38 %40 %20 %29 %
12.5 %≈ 9′Nostalgia40 %39 %25 %30 %
17.5 %≈ 13′Curiosity41 %39 %25 %27 %
22.5 %≈ 16′Curiosity44 %41 %26 %21 %
27.5 %≈ 20′Humor48 %39 %32 %19 %
32.5 %≈ 23′Humor52 %35 %39 %24 %
37.5 %≈ 27′Joy52 %34 %45 %26 %
42.5 %≈ 31′Joy51 %36 %44 %22 %
47.5 %≈ 34′Humor49 %35 %36 %19 %
52.5 %≈ 38′Humor44 %30 %29 %22 %
57.5 %≈ 41′Nostalgia40 %30 %26 %28 %
62.5 %≈ 45′Curiosity43 %32 %29 %35 %
67.5 %≈ 49′Joy55 %27 %38 %49 %
72.5 %≈ 52′Nostalgia59 %30 %38 %48 %
77.5 %≈ 56′Curiosity54 %44 %35 %24 %
82.5 %≈ 59′Joy57 %53 %35 %8 %
87.5 %≈ 63′Curiosity65 %57 %30 %7 %
92.5 %≈ 67′Curiosity61 %50 %27 %15 %
97.5 %≈ 70′Nostalgia53 %35 %25 %29 %
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Perfect Bid: The Contestant Who Knew Too Much. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Perfect Bid: The Contestant Who Knew Too Much — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

TS
Theodore Slauson

BB
Bob Barker

Self

DC
Drew Carey

Self

RD
Roger Dobkowitz

BB
Bob Barker

Details

Directed by
C.J. Wallis, CJ Wallis
Type
Movies
Released
2017
Runtime
72 min
Country
Canada
Ratings
★ IMDb 6.5 · 3,358 ratings
Feels mostly
Curiosity
Data updated

Where to watch

Also on

Availability varies by country

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.