Rent: Live
2019 · 135 min · Director: Alex Rudzinski, Michael Greif
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
The story of several friends in New York City facing financial poverty, homophobia, AIDS, and, of course, rent.
Emotional fingerprint
Rent: Live (2019) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Sadness 25%, Empathy 25%, Love 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Sadness, Empathy, Love. Genres: Musical. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Sadness, Empathy and Love. Its IMDb rating of 6.3/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 62/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Love
- Sadness
- Hope
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Love | Sadness | Hope |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Tension | 53 % | 10 % | 35 % | 27 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 10′ | Sadness | 60 % | 20 % | 40 % | 29 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Humor | 59 % | 25 % | 24 % | 21 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Humor | 56 % | 18 % | 16 % | 23 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Humor | 60 % | 20 % | 27 % | 38 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Hope | 64 % | 26 % | 39 % | 41 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Sadness | 69 % | 35 % | 40 % | 41 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Love | 69 % | 50 % | 23 % | 43 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Humor | 63 % | 40 % | 10 % | 35 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Humor | 66 % | 32 % | 11 % | 40 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Hope | 74 % | 51 % | 20 % | 55 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Love | 71 % | 53 % | 25 % | 54 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Humor | 65 % | 35 % | 24 % | 36 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Tension | 66 % | 35 % | 43 % | 19 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Sadness | 76 % | 54 % | 70 % | 15 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 105′ | Sadness | 86 % | 64 % | 83 % | 16 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 111′ | Sadness | 85 % | 51 % | 74 % | 25 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 118′ | Hope | 80 % | 49 % | 59 % | 46 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 125′ | Love | 84 % | 69 % | 56 % | 61 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 132′ | Hope | 87 % | 80 % | 53 % | 70 % |
Icarus
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Rent: Live. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Roger Davis
Tom Collins
Angel Dumont Schunard
Mimi Marquez
Mrs. Cohen / Mrs Jefferson / Sue
Steve / Life Cafe Waiter / Others
Self
Self
Self
Ensemble
Details
- Directed by
- Alex Rudzinski, Michael Greif
- Written by
- Jonathan Larson, Kristoffer Diaz
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2019
- Runtime
- 135 min
- Country
- United States
- Genres
- Musical
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Sadness
- Data updated
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
