Journal 64
2018 · 118 min · Director: Christoffer Boe
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Two workmen make an alarming discovery in an older Copenhagen apartment: hidden behind a false wall are three mummified corpses, sitting around a dining table with one empty seat left. The case quickly ends up on the desk of Detective Superintendent CARL MØRCK and his assistant, ASSAD, and it is up to them to figure out, who the mummies are as well as who the fourth seat is meant for. Carl and Assad put all effort in to finding the tenant of the apartment and they end up finding clues tracing back to the notorious institution for 'wayward' girls on the island of Sprogø, where extreme neglect and medical experiments in forced sterilization are a part of everyday life. Even though the horrors of Sprogø are a closed chapter in Danish history, there are now people claiming the experiments have continued to go on up until today. Carl and Assad start a race against time to prevent new murders and attacks from happening.
Emotional fingerprint
Journal 64 (2018) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Tension 35%, Disturbing 25%, Curiosity 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Tension35%
- Disturbing25%
- Curiosity20%
- Sadness15%
- Relief5%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Tension, Disturbing, Curiosity. Genres: Thriller, Mystery, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Tension, Disturbing and Curiosity. Its IMDb rating of 7.4/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 74/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Disturbing
- Tension
- Sadness
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Disturbing | Tension | Sadness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Tension | 53 % | 28 % | 45 % | 20 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Curiosity | 52 % | 34 % | 38 % | 16 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Disturbing | 65 % | 59 % | 44 % | 23 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Disturbing | 70 % | 64 % | 49 % | 34 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Curiosity | 60 % | 43 % | 45 % | 31 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 39 % | 46 % | 26 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Curiosity | 54 % | 40 % | 41 % | 28 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Curiosity | 53 % | 38 % | 37 % | 28 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Curiosity | 65 % | 56 % | 51 % | 39 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Disturbing | 79 % | 76 % | 68 % | 53 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Disturbing | 83 % | 76 % | 69 % | 60 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Sadness | 83 % | 65 % | 69 % | 56 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Tension | 84 % | 61 % | 78 % | 43 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Disturbing | 81 % | 59 % | 79 % | 44 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Tension | 74 % | 46 % | 70 % | 51 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Sadness | 74 % | 52 % | 63 % | 61 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 97′ | Sadness | 83 % | 71 % | 68 % | 66 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 103′ | Tension | 86 % | 70 % | 65 % | 54 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 109′ | Relief | 81 % | 60 % | 33 % | 50 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 115′ | Sadness | 78 % | 63 % | 8 % | 60 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Rose Knudsen
Gitte Charles
Nour
Curt Wad som ung
Beate Wad
Mette
Else Munk
Simone
Tage
Details
- Directed by
- Christoffer Boe
- Written by
- Nikolaj Arcel, Mikkel Nørgaard, Jussi Adler-Olsen, Bo Hr. Hansen
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2018
- Runtime
- 118 min
- Country
- Denmark, Germany
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Tension
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
