feeldb

Who You Think I Am

2019 · 101 min · Director: Safy Nebbou ★ IMDb 6.8 · 8,487 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Claire, a 50-year-old divorced teacher, creates a fake Facebook profile of a 24-year-old woman. She finds a photo of a pretty young brunette online and uses it. She has created an entirely fictional character, but why? Originally she did it to spy on Ludo, her on-and-off lover. But Ludo only accepts friend requests from people he knows personally. To get to Jo, Claire sends his best-friend Alex a friend request and he accepts. The pair begins to exchange messages and their fake friendship turns into a fake love affair. Claire is in love with Alex and he is in love with her fake profile. Now he wants to meet the 24-year-old beauty he's been chatting with. She invents a busy job, professional trips and even a jealous ex. The more and more in love they are the more the situation becomes unbearable. Claire is torn between the impossibility of this love and the pain of having to admit her deception and risk losing it.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Who You Think I Am

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Who You Think I Am (2019) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Confusion 30%, Anxiety 25%, Empathy 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Confusion, Anxiety, Empathy. Genres: Drama, Romance. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Confusion, Anxiety and Empathy. Its IMDb rating of 6.8/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 69/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Empathy
  • Sadness
  • Curiosity

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Empathy

Dominant emotion: Love

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Empathy
Sadness
Curiosity
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then peaks around 83 %, then dips around 93 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityEmpathySadnessCuriosity
2.5 %≈ 3′Curiosity42 %33 %23 %42 %
7.5 %≈ 8′Curiosity44 %33 %23 %45 %
12.5 %≈ 13′Curiosity45 %28 %16 %48 %
17.5 %≈ 18′Curiosity48 %33 %19 %46 %
22.5 %≈ 23′Empathy51 %43 %25 %41 %
27.5 %≈ 28′Love55 %43 %24 %30 %
32.5 %≈ 33′Love56 %39 %25 %23 %
37.5 %≈ 38′Tension54 %39 %30 %34 %
42.5 %≈ 43′Curiosity57 %40 %31 %49 %
47.5 %≈ 48′Tension65 %41 %31 %48 %
52.5 %≈ 53′Tension74 %53 %49 %40 %
57.5 %≈ 58′Sadness76 %61 %64 %43 %
62.5 %≈ 63′Curiosity64 %51 %45 %48 %
67.5 %≈ 68′Love60 %44 %26 %37 %
72.5 %≈ 73′Love70 %48 %34 %33 %
77.5 %≈ 78′Tension78 %57 %53 %46 %
82.5 %≈ 83′Sadness80 %68 %59 %58 %
87.5 %≈ 88′Curiosity69 %57 %40 %53 %
92.5 %≈ 93′Empathy52 %40 %22 %38 %
97.5 %≈ 98′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Man in a hole

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Who You Think I Am. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Who You Think I Am — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

NG
Nicole Garcia

Dr. Catherine Bormans

MC
Marie-Ange Casta

Katia

GG
Guillaume Gouix

Ludovic Dalaux

JH
Jules Houplain

Max

JG
Jules Gauzelin

Tristan

FL
Francis Leplay

Serge

PG
Pierre Giraud

Paul

CP
Claude Perron

Solange

FG
François Genty

The Patient

SM
Sonia Mohammed-Chérif

The Student

Details

Directed by
Safy Nebbou
Written by
Julie Peyr, Safy Nebbou, Camille Laurens
Type
Movies
Released
2019
Runtime
101 min
Country
France, Belgium
Genres
Drama, Romance
Ratings
★ IMDb 6.8 · 8,487 ratings
Feels mostly
Confusion
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.