feeldb

Gogol. Viy

2018 · 99 min · Director: Egor Baranov ★ IMDb 5.9 · 1,859 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

A Russian fantasy sequel to "Gogol: The Beginning (2017). Again, Nikolai Gogol, the leading character from the 2017 film, a young man who suffered unpredictable violent epileptic seizures, but during such seizures he would visualize something mysteriously happen in the dark world. This time, a serial killer has already murdered eleven women around a village, rumors spread by the villagers claiming the killer is a dark horseman. Gogol is ordered to investigate the murder cases, instead of going nowhere to solve it, he's beginning to suffer macabre visions more and more during his investigation, then he suddenly learns the next victim would be his girlfriend, Liza. But he doubts his ability won't stop what's gonna happen. Then he accidentally meet a witch hunter, Khoma Brut, with him they stay in an old church and asking the witch, Ulyana, to call up the evil spirit Viy to help fencing off the coming murder.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Gogol. Viy

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Gogol. Viy (2018) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Fear 30%, Tension 25%, Curiosity 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

  1. Fear30%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Fear, Tension, Curiosity. Genres: Thriller, Mystery, Horror. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Fear, Tension and Curiosity. Its IMDb rating of 5.9/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 62/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Tension
  • Curiosity
  • Disturbing

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Tension
Curiosity
Disturbing
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then rises around 33 %, then peaks around 88 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityTensionCuriosityDisturbing
2.5 %≈ 2′Curiosity40 %29 %37 %7 %
7.5 %≈ 7′Curiosity47 %37 %47 %16 %
12.5 %≈ 12′Curiosity54 %48 %49 %28 %
17.5 %≈ 17′Tension60 %52 %50 %40 %
22.5 %≈ 22′Curiosity60 %43 %56 %36 %
27.5 %≈ 27′Curiosity58 %42 %60 %33 %
32.5 %≈ 32′Curiosity66 %60 %55 %48 %
37.5 %≈ 37′Tension75 %72 %44 %58 %
42.5 %≈ 42′Sadness73 %65 %44 %47 %
47.5 %≈ 47′Sadness69 %60 %54 %41 %
52.5 %≈ 52′Tension68 %65 %51 %40 %
57.5 %≈ 57′Tension66 %64 %48 %39 %
62.5 %≈ 62′Curiosity66 %58 %58 %51 %
67.5 %≈ 67′Curiosity62 %52 %64 %47 %
72.5 %≈ 72′Curiosity63 %55 %63 %38 %
77.5 %≈ 77′Tension70 %68 %60 %41 %
82.5 %≈ 82′Tension77 %78 %56 %53 %
87.5 %≈ 87′Tension85 %84 %59 %70 %
92.5 %≈ 92′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
97.5 %≈ 97′Sadness72 %45 %61 %28 %
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Gogol. Viy. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Gogol. Viy — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Alexander Petrov

Gogol Nikolay Vasilievich

ES
Evgeniy Stychkin

AV
Aleksey Vertkov

Homa Brut

AS
Artyom Suchkov

ES
Evgeniy Stychkin

Binh - Investigator

TV
Taisiya Vilkova

Elizaveta Andreevna Danishevskaya - Countess

AT
Artyom Tkachenko

Aleksey Danishevsky - Count, husband of Lisa

MM
Maksim Mironov

10 years-old Gogol

YF
Yuliya Frants

Oksana

YT
Yan Tsapnik

Bomgart (doctor)

SB
Sergey Badyuk

Vakula (blacksmith)

MK
Marta Kessler

Vasilina (Daughter of Vakula)

KR
Kseniya Razina

Ulyana

YS
Yevgeni Syty

Yakim

AL
Anvar Libabov

Noseless

KP
Kirill Poluhin

Basavryuk

YM
Yuliya Marchenko

Gogol's mother

AA
Andrey Astrakhantsev

Gogol's father

AS
Artyom Suchkov

Tesak

MA
Mariya Antonova

Bazhana

EK
Evgeny Kapitonov

Father Varfolomey

NS
Nina Semyonova

Old woman

Details

Directed by
Egor Baranov
Written by
Alexey Chupov, Natasha Merkulova, Aleksey Karaulov, Natalya Merkulova, Aleksey Karaulov, Filipp Konyashov
Type
Movies
Released
2018
Runtime
99 min
Country
Russia
Ratings
★ IMDb 5.9 · 1,859 ratings
Feels mostly
Fear
Data updated

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.