feeldb

The Accountant of Auschwitz

2018 · 78 min · Director: Matthew Shoychet ★ IMDb 7.3 · 3,220 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

Oskar Gröning was one of the last surviving members of the SS to be implicated in Nazi crimes against humanity. Becoming known as the "Accountant of Auschwitz," he was charged with the murder of 300,000 Jews after coming to wider attention for his appearance on the BBC documentary series Auschwitz: The Nazis & the 'Final Solution' (2005). When he took the stand in 2015, at the age of 94, his trial made headlines worldwide. The debate around his prosecution is at the center of this historic yet contemporary look at justice. As survivors travel to Germany to testify, the heinous acts of the Holocaust remain vivid and traumatic. For some, there is no room for debate: Gröning was witness and therefore complicit, regardless of his duty to follow orders. Others look at a frail man in the last years of his life and see no reason to pursue charges. Bringing war criminals to justice, with no statute of limitations, asks fundamental moral questions with few simple answers. From Nuremberg to the new alt-right, The Accountant of Auschwitz constructs a stark reminder that those who forget history are doomed to repeat it.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for The Accountant of Auschwitz

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

The Accountant of Auschwitz (2018) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Sadness 30%, Disturbing 25%, Anger 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

  1. Anger15%
  2. Guilt15%
  3. Awe15%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Sadness, Disturbing, Anger. Genres: Documentary. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Sadness, Disturbing and Anger. Its IMDb rating of 7.3/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 69/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Sadness
  • Disturbing
  • Empathy

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Empathy

Dominant emotion: Disturbing

Dominant emotion: Anger

Dominant emotion: Hope

Sadness
Disturbing
Empathy
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values.
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 57 %, then peaks around 73 %, then peaks around 98 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensitySadnessDisturbingEmpathy
2.5 %≈ 2′Sadness58 %50 %45 %50 %
7.5 %≈ 6′Empathy55 %39 %41 %40 %
12.5 %≈ 10′Disturbing55 %30 %41 %34 %
17.5 %≈ 14′Empathy50 %28 %35 %35 %
22.5 %≈ 18′Sadness51 %34 %41 %32 %
27.5 %≈ 21′Disturbing64 %44 %59 %34 %
32.5 %≈ 25′Anger62 %41 %55 %34 %
37.5 %≈ 29′Hope56 %33 %48 %29 %
42.5 %≈ 33′Disturbing59 %34 %54 %30 %
47.5 %≈ 37′Sadness55 %34 %48 %29 %
52.5 %≈ 41′Hope50 %29 %38 %24 %
57.5 %≈ 45′Hope46 %26 %38 %23 %
62.5 %≈ 49′Disturbing50 %34 %44 %34 %
67.5 %≈ 53′Sadness71 %61 %64 %63 %
72.5 %≈ 57′Sadness90 %86 %85 %84 %
77.5 %≈ 60′Sadness89 %80 %77 %83 %
82.5 %≈ 64′Empathy74 %54 %46 %71 %
87.5 %≈ 68′Empathy64 %40 %38 %55 %
92.5 %≈ 72′Disturbing69 %46 %41 %50 %
97.5 %≈ 76′Hope78 %55 %30 %63 %
Cinderella

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about The Accountant of Auschwitz. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about The Accountant of Auschwitz — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

OG
Oskar Gröning

JA
Jeff Ansell

BG
Bill Glied

Self

HB
Hedy Bohm

TW
Thomas Walther

Self

KF
Kai Feldhaus

Self

HB
Hans-Jürgen Brennecke

Self

AS
Astrid Steinert

Self

ME
Max Eisen

Self

EM
Eva Mozes Kor

Self

RH
Rainer Höß

Self

AD
Alan Dershowitz

Self

BF
Benjamin Ferencz

Self

ER
Eli Rosenbaum

Self

RW
Rebecca Wittmann

Self

ER
Edith Raim

Self

PS
Peter Singer

Self

EZ
Efraim Zuroff

Self

LD
Lawrence Douglas

Self

KG
Kirsten Goetze

Self

JR
Jens Rommel

Self

Details

Directed by
Matthew Shoychet
Written by
Ricki Gurwitz
Type
Movies
Released
2018
Runtime
78 min
Country
Canada
Ratings
★ IMDb 7.3 · 3,220 ratings
Feels mostly
Sadness
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.