feeldb

438 Days

2019 · 124 min · Director: Jesper Ganslandt ★ IMDb 6.7 · 3,905 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

On the eve of June 28th, 2011 Swedish journalists Martin Schibbye and Johan Persson put everything at stake by illegally crossing the border from Somalia into Ethiopia. After months of research, planning and failed attempts, they were finally on their way to report on how the ruthless hunt for oil affected the population of the isolated and conflict-ridden Ogaden region. Five days later they lay wounded in the desert sand, shot and captured by the Ethiopian army. But when their initial reportage died, another story began. A story about lawlessness, propaganda and global politics. After a Kafkaesque trial they were sentenced to eleven years in prison for terrorism. And they were far from alone. Their cellmates were journalists, writers and politicians persecuted for not bowing down to dictatorship. Their reportage about oil was transformed into a story about ink, and their daily lives turned into a fight for survival inside the notorious Kality prison in Addis Ababa. Exposed to deadly diseases, daily beatings and fierce repression - deprived of their shoelaces and their freedom of speech - they fought to preserve the most valuable thing of all: the freedom to determine who you are and what you believe. This is their story of 438 days of hell.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for 438 Days

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

438 Days (2019) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Anxiety 30%, Sadness 25%, Empathy 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Anxiety, Sadness, Empathy. Genres: Thriller, Drama. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Anxiety, Sadness and Empathy. Its IMDb rating of 6.7/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 68/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Empathy
  • Tension
  • Fear

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Dominant emotion: Empathy

Dominant emotion: Relief

Empathy
Tension
Fear
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values.
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then rises around 13 %, then peaks around 33 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityEmpathyTensionFear
2.5 %≈ 3′Tension42 %27 %23 %10 %
7.5 %≈ 9′Sadness59 %38 %39 %25 %
12.5 %≈ 16′Tension71 %43 %55 %39 %
17.5 %≈ 22′Sadness76 %54 %60 %46 %
22.5 %≈ 28′Tension82 %64 %73 %65 %
27.5 %≈ 34′Tension88 %70 %85 %80 %
32.5 %≈ 40′Tension90 %78 %84 %76 %
37.5 %≈ 47′Empathy85 %78 %74 %61 %
42.5 %≈ 53′Tension76 %70 %66 %50 %
47.5 %≈ 59′Empathy74 %64 %68 %51 %
52.5 %≈ 65′Tension76 %66 %63 %49 %
57.5 %≈ 71′Empathy76 %69 %54 %35 %
62.5 %≈ 78′Tension74 %63 %61 %29 %
67.5 %≈ 84′Tension76 %65 %69 %31 %
72.5 %≈ 90′Sadness79 %73 %65 %36 %
77.5 %≈ 96′Empathy75 %68 %65 %40 %
82.5 %≈ 102′Tension79 %65 %75 %46 %
87.5 %≈ 109′Tension88 %68 %70 %45 %
92.5 %≈ 115′Relief86 %65 %36 %23 %
97.5 %≈ 121′Relief80 %62 %10 %5 %
Man in a hole

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about 438 Days. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about 438 Days — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

GS
Gustaf Skarsgård

Martin Schibbye

JN
Josefin Neldén

MV
Matias Varela

Johan Persson

MV
Matias Varela

FA
Faysal Ahmed

Abdullahi Hussein

NR
Nathaniel Ramabulana

Werar

FE
Fredrik Evers

Jens Odlander

JN
Josefin Neldén

Linnéa Schibbye

PZ
Philip Zandén

Carl Bildt

JG
Jesper Ganslandt

Fredrik Spik

SN
Sivuyile Ngesi

Chala

SM
Samuel Mtoti

Dany

GJ
Gunilla Johansson

Kickan Persson

FN
Frederik Nilsson

Kjell Persson

LB
Lena B. Nilsson

Karin Schibbye

GC
Graham Clarke

Bruno

Stephen Jennings

Steven Irving

FS
Fredrik Skavlan

Skavlan

FV
Farouk Valley-Omar

Chief Prosecutor

MK
Mohamed Kalif Barre

Mohammed

PL
Pär Luttropp

TV Journalist

TÅ
Tobias Åström

Swedish Ex-Ambassador

Details

Directed by
Jesper Ganslandt
Written by
Peter Birro, Johan Persson, Martin Schibbye
Type
Movies
Released
2019
Runtime
124 min
Country
Sweden
Ratings
★ IMDb 6.7 · 3,905 ratings
Feels mostly
Anxiety
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.