Holiday in the Wild
2019 · 85 min · Director: Ernie Barbarash
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Jilted by her husband on the eve of embarking on an African safari, a woman travels to the continent alone where she meets an elephant conservationist.
Emotional fingerprint
Holiday in the Wild (2019) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Happiness 30%, Love 25%, Empathy 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Happiness, Love, Empathy. Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Happiness, Love and Empathy. Its IMDb rating of 6.2/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 64/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Love
- Hope
- Joy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Love | Hope | Joy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Love | 53 % | 32 % | 15 % | 24 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 6′ | Sadness | 54 % | 20 % | 13 % | 13 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Hope | 49 % | 12 % | 16 % | 9 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Sadness | 56 % | 21 % | 29 % | 13 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Hope | 58 % | 33 % | 36 % | 21 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Joy | 46 % | 35 % | 30 % | 30 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Love | 46 % | 40 % | 28 % | 34 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Love | 50 % | 43 % | 28 % | 31 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Sadness | 50 % | 40 % | 25 % | 29 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Love | 49 % | 41 % | 23 % | 34 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Love | 48 % | 39 % | 23 % | 36 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Joy | 51 % | 38 % | 29 % | 40 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Joy | 54 % | 43 % | 30 % | 44 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Love | 49 % | 43 % | 25 % | 32 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Love | 50 % | 43 % | 20 % | 19 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Love | 57 % | 40 % | 24 % | 20 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Hope | 57 % | 28 % | 39 % | 31 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Hope | 60 % | 33 % | 51 % | 38 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 79′ | Love | 68 % | 53 % | 57 % | 37 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Rags to riches
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Luke Conrad
Leslie
Aliyah
Trish
Tabitha
Mrs. Burns
Dr. Fowler
Rafi
Olivia
Waiter
Lulu
Nia
Oscar
Jenna
Details
- Directed by
- Ernie Barbarash
- Written by
- Neal H. Dobrofsky, Tippi Dobrofsky
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2019
- Runtime
- 85 min
- Country
- United States
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Happiness
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
