Troll
2022 · 104 min · Director: Roar Uthaug
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
When an explosion in the Norwegian mountains awakens an ancient troll, officials appoint a fearless paleontologist to stop it from wreaking deadly havoc.
Emotional fingerprint
Troll (2022) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Awe 30%, Excitement 25%, Tension 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Awe30%
- Excitement25%
- Tension20%
- Anxiety15%
- Relief10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Awe, Excitement, Tension. Genres: Fantasy, Adventure, Action. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Awe, Excitement and Tension. Its IMDb rating of 5.8/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 59/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Curiosity
- Sadness
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Curiosity | Sadness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Curiosity | 38 % | 15 % | 38 % | 3 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Curiosity | 44 % | 29 % | 45 % | 1 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Curiosity | 49 % | 40 % | 50 % | 4 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Curiosity | 49 % | 40 % | 49 % | 14 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Curiosity | 46 % | 33 % | 49 % | 20 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Curiosity | 48 % | 31 % | 51 % | 16 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Curiosity | 50 % | 40 % | 49 % | 11 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Tension | 51 % | 48 % | 39 % | 16 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Tension | 64 % | 57 % | 27 % | 41 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Sadness | 73 % | 61 % | 28 % | 56 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Curiosity | 66 % | 56 % | 35 % | 39 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 60′ | Tension | 63 % | 57 % | 31 % | 25 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Tension | 60 % | 55 % | 34 % | 28 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Curiosity | 64 % | 56 % | 41 % | 28 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Tension | 74 % | 70 % | 30 % | 19 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Tension | 80 % | 80 % | 18 % | 18 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Tension | 81 % | 76 % | 11 % | 34 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Empathy | 68 % | 51 % | 13 % | 39 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 96′ | Humor | 48 % | 25 % | 22 % | 23 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 101′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Troll. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Hoffsjef Rikard Sinding
Professor Møller
Professor Wangler
Oddrun Gundersen
Lars Gundersen
Fisherman
Specialist
OPS Officer
Helicopter Soldier Captain
Specialist
Details
- Directed by
- Roar Uthaug
- Written by
- Roar Uthaug, Espen Aukan
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2022
- Runtime
- 104 min
- Country
- Norway
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Awe
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
