A Perfect Pairing
2022 · 101 min · Director: Stuart McDonald
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
To land a major client, an LA wine exec travels to an Australian sheep station, where she signs on as a ranch hand and hits it off with a rugged local.
Emotional fingerprint
A Perfect Pairing (2022) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Love 35%, Joy 25%, Humor 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Love35%
- Joy25%
- Humor20%
- Satisfaction20%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Love, Joy, Humor. Genres: Comedy, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Love, Joy and Humor. Its IMDb rating of 6.1/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 64/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Joy
- Love
- Humor
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Joy | Love | Humor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 38 % | 17 % | 2 % | 32 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Humor | 43 % | 23 % | 5 % | 31 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Joy | 44 % | 26 % | 8 % | 30 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Humor | 41 % | 20 % | 6 % | 34 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Humor | 43 % | 16 % | 5 % | 40 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Humor | 45 % | 16 % | 6 % | 43 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Humor | 44 % | 20 % | 11 % | 39 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Joy | 46 % | 36 % | 20 % | 35 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Joy | 49 % | 45 % | 24 % | 38 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Humor | 49 % | 43 % | 25 % | 39 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Joy | 53 % | 45 % | 33 % | 35 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Joy | 54 % | 43 % | 33 % | 32 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Joy | 53 % | 39 % | 26 % | 35 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Joy | 50 % | 41 % | 29 % | 34 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Joy | 50 % | 40 % | 38 % | 26 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Love | 56 % | 30 % | 39 % | 20 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Tension | 59 % | 21 % | 30 % | 16 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Sadness | 63 % | 36 % | 38 % | 20 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Joy | 72 % | 60 % | 57 % | 27 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Icarus
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Carlos
Sam
Tim
Danno
Hamish
John
Diane
Peter
Bartender Ian
Heidi
Felix
Buyer
Details
- Directed by
- Stuart McDonald
- Written by
- Elizabeth Hackett, Hilary Galanoy
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2022
- Runtime
- 101 min
- Country
- Australia, United States of America
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Love
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
