Malevolent
2018 · 89 min · Director: Olaf de Fleur Johannesson
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A brother-sister team who fake paranormal encounters for cash get more than they bargained for when a job at a haunted estate turns very, very real.
Emotional fingerprint
Malevolent (2018) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Fear 35%, Anxiety 25%, Tension 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Fear35%
- Anxiety25%
- Tension20%
- Surprise10%
- Disturbing10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Fear, Anxiety, Tension. Genres: Horror. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Fear, Anxiety and Tension. Its IMDb rating of 4.9/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 56/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Disturbing
- Sadness
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Disturbing | Sadness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Curiosity | 37 % | 25 % | 15 % | 23 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Curiosity | 39 % | 30 % | 16 % | 25 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Curiosity | 38 % | 29 % | 16 % | 24 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Sadness | 39 % | 26 % | 19 % | 30 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Sadness | 51 % | 36 % | 29 % | 45 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Sadness | 61 % | 48 % | 41 % | 49 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Disturbing | 59 % | 46 % | 48 % | 41 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Sadness | 54 % | 45 % | 39 % | 31 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Tension | 53 % | 46 % | 25 % | 18 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Curiosity | 57 % | 50 % | 23 % | 14 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Tension | 68 % | 61 % | 39 % | 24 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Disturbing | 70 % | 64 % | 59 % | 29 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Disturbing | 70 % | 65 % | 57 % | 28 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 60′ | Tension | 79 % | 76 % | 51 % | 40 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Tension | 88 % | 84 % | 65 % | 54 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Disturbing | 91 % | 86 % | 85 % | 56 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Disturbing | 94 % | 90 % | 93 % | 64 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Tension | 91 % | 76 % | 75 % | 71 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Sadness | 85 % | 48 % | 47 % | 75 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Claire
Missy
Tammy
Maddy
Susie
Ghost
Victor
Details
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
