Battle Royale II: Requiem
2003 · 155 min · Director: Kinji Fukasaku, Kenta Fukasaku
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
It's three years after the events of the original Battle Royale, and Shuya Nanahara is now an internationally-known terrorist determined to bring down the government. His terrorist group, Wild Seven, stages an attack that levels several buildings in Tokyo on Christmas Day, killing 8000 people. In order for the government to study the benefits of "teamwork", the new students work in pairs, with their collars electronically linked so that if one of them is killed, the other dies as well. They must kill Nanahara in three days - or die.
Emotional fingerprint
Battle Royale II: Requiem (2003) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Tension 32%, Fear 25%, Sadness 18%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Tension32%
- Fear25%
- Sadness18%
- Anger15%
- Disturbing10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Tension, Fear, Sadness. Genres: Thriller, Action. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Tension, Fear and Sadness. Its IMDb rating of 4.6/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 54/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Sadness
- Tension
- Disturbing
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Sadness | Tension | Disturbing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 4′ | Tension | 57 % | 15 % | 50 % | 50 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Disturbing | 68 % | 18 % | 61 % | 64 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Tension | 81 % | 26 % | 76 % | 76 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Disturbing | 88 % | 44 % | 84 % | 83 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Disturbing | 88 % | 57 % | 84 % | 84 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Disturbing | 86 % | 60 % | 83 % | 80 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Tension | 81 % | 60 % | 79 % | 70 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Tension | 78 % | 65 % | 70 % | 60 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Sadness | 81 % | 76 % | 59 % | 50 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Sadness | 78 % | 74 % | 51 % | 36 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Sadness | 71 % | 59 % | 57 % | 36 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 89′ | Tension | 72 % | 55 % | 68 % | 39 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 97′ | Sadness | 78 % | 65 % | 71 % | 34 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 105′ | Sadness | 81 % | 71 % | 71 % | 36 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 112′ | Sadness | 81 % | 71 % | 64 % | 38 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 120′ | Sadness | 82 % | 66 % | 45 % | 26 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 128′ | Hope | 82 % | 52 % | 27 % | 13 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 136′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 143′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 151′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Rags to riches
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Ryo Kurosawa
Naoki Jo
Tatsuhiko Hasegawa
Kenji Maezono
Shintaro Makimura
Yosuke Miyadai
Kyoko Kakei
Details
- Directed by
- Kinji Fukasaku, Kenta Fukasaku
- Written by
- Kenta Fukasaku, Norio Kida
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2003
- Runtime
- 155 min
- Country
- Japan
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Tension
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
