History of the World: Part I
1981 · 92 min · Director: Mel Brooks
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
An uproarious version of history that proves nothing is sacred – not even the Roman Empire, the French Revolution and the Spanish Inquisition.
Emotional fingerprint
History of the World: Part I (1981) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 45%, Smile 20%, Surprise 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor45%
- Smile20%
- Surprise15%
- Joy10%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Smile, Surprise. Genres: Comedy. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Smile and Surprise. Its IMDb rating of 6.8/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 71/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Tension
- Disturbing
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Tension | Disturbing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 43 % | 43 % | 8 % | 2 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Humor | 54 % | 54 % | 6 % | 4 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Humor | 68 % | 66 % | 13 % | 13 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Humor | 69 % | 66 % | 23 % | 20 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Humor | 66 % | 65 % | 19 % | 15 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Humor | 70 % | 69 % | 19 % | 16 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Humor | 70 % | 68 % | 28 % | 24 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Humor | 66 % | 64 % | 31 % | 21 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Humor | 68 % | 64 % | 40 % | 15 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 44′ | Humor | 70 % | 66 % | 43 % | 10 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Humor | 68 % | 65 % | 31 % | 16 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Humor | 66 % | 63 % | 26 % | 35 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Humor | 68 % | 61 % | 29 % | 43 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Humor | 68 % | 61 % | 27 % | 32 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 67′ | Humor | 69 % | 64 % | 25 % | 29 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Humor | 70 % | 64 % | 30 % | 38 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Humor | 68 % | 63 % | 34 % | 33 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Humor | 66 % | 63 % | 35 % | 18 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 85′ | Humor | 66 % | 61 % | 33 % | 10 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 90′ | Humor | 62 % | 58 % | 20 % | 5 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about History of the World: Part I. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Prehistoric Woman
Prehistoric Man
Prehistoric Man
Prehistoric Man
Prehistoric Man
Prehistoric Man / Disciple - The Roman Empire
Details
- Directed by
- Mel Brooks
- Written by
- Mel Brooks
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1981
- Runtime
- 92 min
- Country
- United States of America
- Genres
- Comedy
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
