Gallipoli
1981 · 112 min · Director: Peter Weir
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Two Australian sprinters face the brutal realities of war when they are sent to fight in the Gallipoli campaign in the Ottoman Empire during World War I.
Your viewing check-in
Emotional fingerprint
Gallipoli (1981) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Sadness 38%, Empathy 25%, Tension 18%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Sadness, Empathy, Tension. Genres: Drama, History, War. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Sadness, Empathy and Tension. Its IMDb rating of 7.4/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 74/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Empathy
- Sadness
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Excitement
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Empathy | Sadness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Excitement | 41 % | 20 % | 13 % | 3 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Excitement | 42 % | 22 % | 19 % | 9 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Empathy | 44 % | 24 % | 25 % | 13 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Excitement | 51 % | 26 % | 33 % | 16 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Empathy | 53 % | 31 % | 35 % | 19 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Tension | 49 % | 36 % | 26 % | 11 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Humor | 47 % | 27 % | 20 % | 5 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Humor | 49 % | 18 % | 25 % | 14 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Humor | 52 % | 17 % | 28 % | 20 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Humor | 50 % | 21 % | 19 % | 11 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Humor | 49 % | 26 % | 12 % | 3 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Humor | 49 % | 25 % | 14 % | 5 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Excitement | 51 % | 32 % | 22 % | 10 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Tension | 59 % | 52 % | 31 % | 15 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Tension | 67 % | 63 % | 44 % | 31 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Sadness | 72 % | 63 % | 60 % | 53 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Sadness | 80 % | 70 % | 69 % | 65 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Tension | 90 % | 85 % | 71 % | 70 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 104′ | Tension | 94 % | 93 % | 71 % | 70 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 109′ | Tension | 93 % | 92 % | 68 % | 65 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Billy
Barney
Railway Foreman
Athletics Official 2
Announcer
Recruiting Officer
Waitress
Billy Snakeskin
Camel Driver
Mary
Details
- Directed by
- Peter Weir
- Written by
- Peter Weir, Ernest Raymond, David Williamson
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1981
- Runtime
- 112 min
- Country
- Australia
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Sadness
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.





