feeldb

Rollerball

1975 · 125 min · Director: Norman Jewison ★ IMDb 6.5 · 33,010 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

In a corporate-controlled future, an ultra-violent sport known as Rollerball represents the world, and one of its powerful athletes is out to defy those who want him out of the game.

Trailer for Rollerball

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Rollerball (1975) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Tension 35%, Excitement 25%, Fear 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

  1. Fear20%
  2. Anger10%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Tension, Excitement, Fear. Genres: Action, Sci-Fi. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Tension, Excitement and Fear. Its IMDb rating of 6.5/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 69/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Tension
  • Disturbing
  • Excitement

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Excitement

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Disturbing

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Tension
Disturbing
Excitement
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 23 %, then dips around 43 %, then peaks around 93 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensityTensionDisturbingExcitement
2.5 %≈ 3′Excitement47 %23 %5 %47 %
7.5 %≈ 9′Excitement54 %33 %6 %54 %
12.5 %≈ 16′Excitement54 %38 %13 %43 %
17.5 %≈ 22′Curiosity46 %38 %20 %16 %
22.5 %≈ 28′Curiosity44 %38 %23 %9 %
27.5 %≈ 34′Curiosity50 %44 %30 %15 %
32.5 %≈ 41′Tension55 %50 %44 %19 %
37.5 %≈ 47′Disturbing49 %41 %41 %23 %
42.5 %≈ 53′Excitement44 %36 %29 %23 %
47.5 %≈ 59′Curiosity48 %44 %30 %20 %
52.5 %≈ 66′Tension50 %46 %32 %29 %
57.5 %≈ 72′Excitement57 %54 %35 %43 %
62.5 %≈ 78′Tension71 %66 %53 %45 %
67.5 %≈ 84′Sadness71 %64 %61 %30 %
72.5 %≈ 91′Curiosity56 %48 %45 %9 %
77.5 %≈ 97′Curiosity51 %39 %33 %0 %
82.5 %≈ 103′Sadness64 %54 %43 %9 %
87.5 %≈ 109′Tension78 %75 %61 %24 %
92.5 %≈ 116′Tension83 %83 %72 %28 %
97.5 %≈ 122′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

JH
John Houseman

Bartholomew

PH
Pamela Hensley

BT
Barbara Trentham

JN
John Normington

Shane Rimmer

Rusty, Team Executive

SR
Shane Rimmer

JN
John Normington

Executive

Burt Kwouk

Japanese Doctor

NB
Nancy Bleier

Girl in Library

RL
Richard LeParmentier

Bartholomew's Aide

RI
Robert Ito

Strategy Coach for Houston Team

Ralph Richardson

Librarian

VK
Valli Kemp

Woman at Party (uncredited)

DE
Dick Enberg

Pregame Announcer (uncredited)

TB
Tony Brubaker

Blue (uncredited)

BT
Burnell Tucker

Jonathan's Captain of Guard (uncredited)

Angus MacInnes

Jonathan's Guard

DG
David Griffin

Man Collecting Coats

Details

Directed by
Norman Jewison
Written by
William Harrison
Type
Movies
Released
1975
Runtime
125 min
Country
United States of America
Genres
Action, Sci-Fi
Ratings
★ IMDb 6.5 · 33,010 ratings
Feels mostly
Tension
Data updated

Where to watch

Also on

Availability varies by country

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.