The Gendarme in New York
1965 · 95 min · Director: Jean Girault
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Sergeant Cruchot and his faithful comrades have been sent to the International Congress of Gendarmerie in N.Y.
Emotional fingerprint
The Gendarme in New York (1965) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 40%, Joy 25%, Smile 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Joy, Smile. Genres: Comedy. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Joy and Smile. Its IMDb rating of 6.4/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 69/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Anticipation
- Tension
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Anticipation
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Anticipation | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Humor | 47 % | 42 % | 40 % | 9 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Anticipation | 52 % | 44 % | 38 % | 11 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Humor | 56 % | 52 % | 23 % | 13 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Humor | 55 % | 54 % | 13 % | 16 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Humor | 48 % | 41 % | 20 % | 23 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 26′ | Anticipation | 45 % | 28 % | 35 % | 23 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Anticipation | 45 % | 29 % | 35 % | 15 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Humor | 49 % | 43 % | 24 % | 18 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Humor | 54 % | 53 % | 21 % | 25 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Humor | 57 % | 56 % | 18 % | 21 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Humor | 56 % | 56 % | 15 % | 16 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Humor | 53 % | 53 % | 23 % | 14 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Humor | 52 % | 50 % | 26 % | 14 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Humor | 50 % | 49 % | 25 % | 16 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Humor | 52 % | 50 % | 25 % | 24 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Humor | 56 % | 53 % | 25 % | 34 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Humor | 57 % | 51 % | 29 % | 39 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Humor | 54 % | 44 % | 34 % | 41 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Tension | 53 % | 39 % | 32 % | 39 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Humor | 56 % | 47 % | 28 % | 32 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about The Gendarme in New York. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Franck
Adjutant Renzo
Un ami de Nicole
Taxifahrer
Le lieutenant de police
Une vendeuse
Details
- Directed by
- Jean Girault
- Written by
- Jean Girault, Jacques Vilfrid, Richard Balducci
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1965
- Runtime
- 95 min
- Country
- France
- Genres
- Comedy
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
