Jules and Jim
1962 · 106 min · Director: François Truffaut
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
In the carefree days before World War I, introverted Austrian author Jules strikes up a friendship with the exuberant Frenchman Jim and both men fall for the impulsive and beautiful Catherine.
Emotional fingerprint
Jules and Jim (1962) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Melancholy 35%, Love 25%, Empathy 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Melancholy35%
- Love25%
- Empathy20%
- Sadness10%
- Anxiety10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Melancholy, Love, Empathy. Genres: Drama, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Melancholy, Love and Empathy. Its IMDb rating of 7.6/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 75/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Sadness
- Love
- Tension
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Sadness | Love | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 40 % | 5 % | 30 % | 8 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Curiosity | 41 % | 4 % | 31 % | 6 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Love | 41 % | 6 % | 28 % | 11 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Curiosity | 39 % | 13 % | 23 % | 18 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Love | 40 % | 13 % | 25 % | 20 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Tension | 46 % | 19 % | 28 % | 30 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Sadness | 49 % | 34 % | 29 % | 31 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Sadness | 45 % | 38 % | 26 % | 25 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Sadness | 45 % | 37 % | 24 % | 29 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Sadness | 48 % | 40 % | 29 % | 32 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Love | 50 % | 43 % | 36 % | 31 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Sadness | 56 % | 43 % | 46 % | 29 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Love | 57 % | 33 % | 53 % | 25 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 72′ | Love | 54 % | 28 % | 43 % | 28 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Tension | 55 % | 35 % | 33 % | 40 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Love | 59 % | 45 % | 35 % | 44 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Sadness | 57 % | 50 % | 35 % | 36 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Sadness | 56 % | 51 % | 33 % | 35 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Sadness | 66 % | 60 % | 29 % | 48 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 103′ | Sadness | 78 % | 70 % | 23 % | 62 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Mathilde
Homme Ivre au café
Une des femmes
Merlin
Birgitta
Client dans Café
Helga
Details
- Directed by
- François Truffaut
- Written by
- Henri-Pierre Roché
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1962
- Runtime
- 106 min
- Country
- France
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Melancholy
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
