feeldb

Judgment at Nuremberg

1961 · 191 min · Director: Stanley Kramer ★ IMDb 8.3 · 98,890 ratings

Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)

In 1947, four German judges who served on the bench during the Nazi regime face a military tribunal to answer charges of crimes against humanity. Chief Justice Haywood hears evidence and testimony not only from lead defendant Ernst Janning and his defense attorney Hans Rolfe, but also from the widow of a Nazi general, an idealistic U.S. Army captain and reluctant witness Irene Wallner.

Ask Kadri

Trailer for Judgment at Nuremberg

Playing the trailer connects to YouTube. No connection is made until you choose to play.

Rate how it felt
Working…

Your viewing check-in

Emotional fingerprint

Judgment at Nuremberg (1961) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Empathy 35%, Awe 20%, Guilt 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure

20%Awe
15%Guilt
  1. Awe20%
  2. Guilt15%

AI estimate · no viewer votes yet

How we measure

AI estimate

Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.

Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.

Why it feels this way

The strongest emotional signals are Empathy, Awe, Guilt. Genres: Drama, History. AI estimate.

Is it worth watching?

Consider this title if you are looking for Empathy, Awe and Guilt. Its IMDb rating of 8.3/10 suggests a strong audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 72/100.

How did it make you feel?

Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.

Pick up to three · 0/3

1
2
3

Emotional journey

AI · from subtitles
  • Sadness
  • Disturbing
  • Tension

Not enough subtitle evidence

No dominant emotion

Dominant emotion: Curiosity

Dominant emotion: Disturbing

Dominant emotion: Empathy

Dominant emotion: Tension

Dominant emotion: Sadness

Sadness
Disturbing
Tension
Emotional journey Emotional intensity over the film’s runtime, from quieter to stronger on a fixed 0–1 scale. Hatched intervals have insufficient subtitle evidence. The table provides the values. Not enough subtitle evidence
Ending hidden

Dominant emotion

Intensity dips around 3 %, then rises around 48 %, then peaks around 57 %.Ending hidden

Emotional journey
%Approximate minuteDominant emotionOverall intensitySadnessDisturbingTension
2.5 %≈ 5′Curiosity42 %22 %27 %31 %
7.5 %≈ 14′Curiosity47 %22 %33 %39 %
12.5 %≈ 24′Curiosity52 %24 %39 %43 %
17.5 %≈ 33′Disturbing54 %30 %46 %42 %
22.5 %≈ 43′Curiosity49 %30 %38 %39 %
27.5 %≈ 53′Curiosity53 %36 %39 %44 %
32.5 %≈ 62′Empathy60 %44 %45 %48 %
37.5 %≈ 72′Curiosity47 %33 %28 %36 %
42.5 %≈ 81′Curiosity44 %30 %26 %37 %
47.5 %≈ 91′Tension62 %47 %51 %54 %
52.5 %≈ 100′Disturbing79 %66 %75 %63 %
57.5 %≈ 110′Disturbing83 %73 %79 %61 %
62.5 %≈ 119′Sadness76 %61 %63 %64 %
67.5 %≈ 129′Tension73 %53 %54 %70 %
72.5 %≈ 138′Disturbing76 %57 %63 %70 %
77.5 %≈ 148′Disturbing74 %58 %66 %66 %
82.5 %≈ 158′Tension69 %54 %60 %60 %
87.5 %≈ 167′Sadness64 %54 %50 %52 %
92.5 %≈ 177′Curiosity57 %49 %34 %43 %
97.5 %≈ 186′Not enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidenceNot enough subtitle evidence
Riches to rags

Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.

Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.

Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.

Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.

Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.

Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.

AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗

Kadri — your film companion

AI

Ask anything about Judgment at Nuremberg. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.

Kadri

Hi, I’m Kadri. Ask me anything about Judgment at Nuremberg — I’ll stay inside your spoiler line.

Premise only
Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers

Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.

0 responses so far

Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.

Cast

Maximilian Schell

Hans Rolfe

Burt Lancaster

Ernst Janning

William Shatner

Harrison Byers

WK
Werner Klemperer

KM
Kenneth MacKenna

TM
Torben Meyer

Werner Lampe

JB
Joseph Bernard

Abe Radnitz

AB
Alan Baxter

Matt Merrin

EB
Edward Binns

Senator Burkette

VC
Virginia Christine

Mrs. Halbestadt

OW
Otto Waldis

Pohl

Karl Swenson

Heinrich Geuter

MB
Martin Brandt

Friedrich Hofstetter

RT
Ray Teal

Curtiss Ives

JW
John Wengraf

Karl Wieck

Details

Directed by
Stanley Kramer
Written by
Abby Mann
Type
Movies
Released
1961
Runtime
191 min
Country
United States of America
Genres
Drama, History
Ratings
★ IMDb 8.3 · 98,890 ratings
Feels mostly
Empathy
Data updated

Where to watch

Data: JustWatch · Wikidata

Feels similar

More like this →

Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.