Creature from the Black Lagoon
1954 · 79 min · Director: Jack Arnold
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
When scientists exploring the Amazon River stumble on a “missing link” connecting humans and fish, they plan to capture it for later study. But the Creature has plans of his own, and has set his sights on the lead scientist's beautiful fiancée, Kay.
Emotional fingerprint
Creature from the Black Lagoon (1954) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Fear 35%, Tension 25%, Excitement 15%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Fear35%
- Tension25%
- Excitement15%
- Empathy15%
- Awe10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Fear, Tension, Excitement. Genres: Adventure, Horror, Sci-Fi. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Fear, Tension and Excitement. Its IMDb rating of 6.9/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 70/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Curiosity
- Fear
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Curiosity | Fear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Curiosity | 52 % | 6 % | 52 % | 0 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 6′ | Curiosity | 51 % | 10 % | 51 % | 4 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 10′ | Curiosity | 53 % | 24 % | 50 % | 13 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Tension | 50 % | 38 % | 41 % | 22 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Tension | 46 % | 38 % | 39 % | 22 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Curiosity | 43 % | 29 % | 41 % | 14 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 26′ | Curiosity | 38 % | 25 % | 34 % | 9 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Tension | 43 % | 38 % | 33 % | 18 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Tension | 54 % | 50 % | 42 % | 27 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Tension | 61 % | 57 % | 48 % | 38 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Tension | 58 % | 55 % | 43 % | 32 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 49′ | Tension | 59 % | 54 % | 31 % | 30 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Sadness | 62 % | 54 % | 20 % | 33 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Tension | 69 % | 64 % | 13 % | 45 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Tension | 76 % | 75 % | 10 % | 58 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 69′ | Tension | 71 % | 69 % | 8 % | 47 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Relief | 66 % | 63 % | 6 % | 40 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Tension | 70 % | 67 % | 5 % | 47 % |
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Dr. Matos (uncredited)
Old Man (uncredited)
The Gill Man On Land (uncredited)
Details
- Directed by
- Jack Arnold
- Written by
- Harry Essex, Arthur A. Ross, Maurice Zimm
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1954
- Runtime
- 79 min
- Country
- United States of America
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Fear
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
