Shelby Oaks
2025 · 91 min · Director: Chris Stuckmann
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A woman's obsessive search for her missing sister leads her into a terrifying mystery at the hands of an unknown evil.
Emotional fingerprint
Shelby Oaks (2025) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Fear 40%, Anxiety 25%, Tension 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Fear, Anxiety, Tension. Genres: Mystery, Horror. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Fear, Anxiety and Tension. Its IMDb rating of 5.3/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 58/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Fear
- Disturbing
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Fear
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Fear | Disturbing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Fear | 67 % | 60 % | 57 % | 40 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Curiosity | 66 % | 56 % | 50 % | 44 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Disturbing | 69 % | 56 % | 51 % | 54 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Sadness | 63 % | 51 % | 46 % | 44 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 49 % | 38 % | 28 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Tension | 61 % | 56 % | 43 % | 30 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Curiosity | 63 % | 54 % | 43 % | 39 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Curiosity | 63 % | 50 % | 41 % | 48 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Curiosity | 68 % | 57 % | 53 % | 56 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Fear | 70 % | 64 % | 63 % | 60 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Fear | 62 % | 58 % | 55 % | 48 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Curiosity | 51 % | 46 % | 36 % | 31 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 53 % | 35 % | 39 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Tension | 73 % | 70 % | 51 % | 56 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Tension | 83 % | 78 % | 65 % | 69 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Disturbing | 80 % | 69 % | 63 % | 69 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Tension | 75 % | 60 % | 54 % | 60 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Disturbing | 74 % | 53 % | 49 % | 54 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Sadness | 60 % | 28 % | 29 % | 31 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 89′ | Sadness | 43 % | 8 % | 10 % | 8 % |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Janet
Reactor #1
Reactor #2
Reactor #3
Marilyn
Young Mia
David
Jess
News Anchor #3
Details
- Directed by
- Chris Stuckmann
- Written by
- Chris Stuckmann, Sam Liz
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2025
- Runtime
- 91 min
- Country
- United States of America, Belgium
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Fear
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
