The 33D Invader
2011 · 82 min · Director: Cash Chin Man-Kei
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A young woman named Future is sent from the year 2046 to the year 2011 in Hong Kong. Future was sent by the United Nations in order to get pregnant, where she can then extract her genes and repopulate the earth as 99% of males have become infertile in the future due to attacks from Planet Xucker. Two assassins from Xuckler are sent after her to stop her. Future meets three University students: Felix, Dan-san and Sing. The men are obsessed with female students next door: Chin-chin, Chen-chen and Sai-sai. The students agree to help Future find a mate at the university.
Emotional fingerprint
The 33D Invader (2011) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 38%, Surprise 20%, Excitement 18%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor38%
- Surprise20%
- Excitement18%
- Confusion14%
- Love10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Surprise, Excitement. Genres: Comedy, Sci-Fi. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Surprise and Excitement. Its IMDb rating of 4.0/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 60/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Disturbing
- Tension
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Disturbing | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Curiosity | 42 % | 35 % | 12 % | 13 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 6′ | Humor | 45 % | 43 % | 14 % | 14 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 10′ | Humor | 46 % | 46 % | 16 % | 19 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Humor | 43 % | 41 % | 16 % | 21 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Curiosity | 43 % | 39 % | 15 % | 21 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Humor | 48 % | 43 % | 16 % | 21 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Humor | 50 % | 46 % | 15 % | 15 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Humor | 49 % | 48 % | 13 % | 10 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Humor | 48 % | 45 % | 20 % | 15 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Humor | 51 % | 40 % | 38 % | 30 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Disturbing | 54 % | 39 % | 44 % | 39 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Humor | 50 % | 42 % | 35 % | 33 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Humor | 50 % | 42 % | 37 % | 40 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Humor | 55 % | 36 % | 46 % | 45 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Disturbing | 61 % | 29 % | 54 % | 51 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Humor | 61 % | 34 % | 48 % | 54 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 72′ | Tension | 58 % | 40 % | 35 % | 48 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Humor | 53 % | 41 % | 20 % | 26 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Love | 52 % | 43 % | 15 % | 12 % |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about The 33D Invader. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Jane
Cici
Stephen
Danson
Sean
Professor
Details
- Directed by
- Cash Chin Man-Kei
- Written by
- Sean Chan
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2011
- Runtime
- 82 min
- Country
- Hong Kong
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
