Caramelo
2025 · 100 min · Director: Diego Freitas
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
After a life-changing diagnosis, a promising chef finds hope and humor with the help of a fur-midable dog friend.
Emotional fingerprint
Caramelo (2025) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Hope 30%, Humor 25%, Empathy 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Hope, Humor, Empathy. Genres: Comedy, Drama. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Hope, Humor and Empathy. Its IMDb rating of 7.1/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 71/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Love
- Hope
- Sadness
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Love | Hope | Sadness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 37 % | 8 % | 12 % | 7 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Humor | 44 % | 8 % | 19 % | 4 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Tension | 56 % | 19 % | 36 % | 3 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Hope | 61 % | 36 % | 44 % | 1 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 23′ | Humor | 65 % | 35 % | 28 % | 19 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Sadness | 75 % | 35 % | 21 % | 53 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Love | 74 % | 44 % | 31 % | 59 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 38′ | Humor | 63 % | 35 % | 29 % | 41 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Humor | 58 % | 30 % | 21 % | 34 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Love | 60 % | 45 % | 29 % | 32 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Love | 66 % | 54 % | 38 % | 29 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Tension | 76 % | 46 % | 28 % | 45 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 63′ | Sadness | 80 % | 43 % | 26 % | 63 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Hope | 75 % | 55 % | 48 % | 49 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Love | 76 % | 63 % | 58 % | 44 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Sadness | 80 % | 53 % | 59 % | 54 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Hope | 83 % | 50 % | 59 % | 54 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Tension | 89 % | 65 % | 56 % | 50 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 93′ | Love | 88 % | 77 % | 59 % | 36 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Love | 78 % | 77 % | 52 % | 25 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Caramelo. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Caramelo
Ivan
Sandro
Adolescente Quimioterapia
Funcionário da Prefeitura
Theo (6 Meses)
Theo (6 Anos)
Cliente do Mercadão
Homem do Frango
Details
- Directed by
- Diego Freitas
- Written by
- Vitor Brandt, Marcelo Saback, Diego Freitas, Rod Azevedo
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2025
- Runtime
- 100 min
- Country
- Brazil
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Hope
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
