Papi Chulo
2019 · 98 min · Director: John Butler
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A lonely TV weatherman strikes up an unusual friendship with a middle-aged Latino migrant worker.
Emotional fingerprint
Papi Chulo (2019) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Empathy 35%, Love 25%, Humor 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Empathy, Love, Humor. Genres: Comedy, Drama. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Empathy, Love and Humor. Its IMDb rating of 6.6/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 68/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Sadness
- Empathy
- Hope
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Sadness | Empathy | Hope |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Sadness | 47 % | 41 % | 41 % | 1 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Sadness | 44 % | 38 % | 37 % | 2 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Humor | 40 % | 26 % | 29 % | 7 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Humor | 41 % | 13 % | 23 % | 16 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Humor | 44 % | 13 % | 27 % | 27 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Hope | 50 % | 29 % | 41 % | 36 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Empathy | 52 % | 38 % | 47 % | 35 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 37′ | Humor | 46 % | 31 % | 41 % | 28 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Empathy | 46 % | 33 % | 42 % | 22 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 47′ | Sadness | 49 % | 36 % | 44 % | 20 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Humor | 47 % | 23 % | 33 % | 26 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Humor | 51 % | 26 % | 34 % | 24 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Sadness | 57 % | 45 % | 46 % | 12 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Sadness | 52 % | 44 % | 46 % | 5 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Tension | 52 % | 41 % | 46 % | 6 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Sadness | 64 % | 55 % | 59 % | 6 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Sadness | 77 % | 72 % | 72 % | 8 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Sadness | 79 % | 70 % | 76 % | 26 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 91′ | Hope | 73 % | 47 % | 68 % | 53 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 96′ | Hope | 68 % | 27 % | 58 % | 64 % |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Papi Chulo. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Linda
Director
Horticultural Student #1
Horticultural Student #2
Devan
Todd
Shaved Ice Vendor
Boat Attendant
Karl
Nurse Navarro
Juan
Jesús
Hipster
Details
- Directed by
- John Butler
- Written by
- John Butler
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2019
- Runtime
- 98 min
- Country
- Ireland, United Kingdom
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Empathy
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
