The Perfect Neighbor
2025 · 97 min · Director: Geeta Gandbhir
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Police bodycam footage reveals how a long-running neighborhood dispute turned fatal in this documentary about fear, prejudice and Stand Your Ground laws.
Emotional fingerprint
The Perfect Neighbor (2025) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Disturbing 35%, Anger 25%, Anxiety 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Disturbing35%
- Anger25%
- Anxiety20%
- Empathy15%
- Sadness5%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Disturbing, Anger, Anxiety. Genres: Thriller, Documentary, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Disturbing, Anger and Anxiety. Its IMDb rating of 7.1/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 73/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Empathy
- Sadness
- Tension
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Anger
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Empathy | Sadness | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Tension | 65 % | 40 % | 30 % | 62 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Anger | 50 % | 36 % | 19 % | 44 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 12′ | Empathy | 45 % | 39 % | 15 % | 34 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 17′ | Anger | 50 % | 43 % | 18 % | 39 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Tension | 52 % | 40 % | 18 % | 43 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Anger | 49 % | 36 % | 16 % | 39 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 32′ | Empathy | 49 % | 36 % | 15 % | 41 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Tension | 65 % | 43 % | 25 % | 61 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Tension | 83 % | 56 % | 46 % | 80 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Tension | 91 % | 75 % | 69 % | 74 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Sadness | 92 % | 88 % | 84 % | 51 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 56′ | Sadness | 82 % | 79 % | 76 % | 40 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Sadness | 72 % | 68 % | 65 % | 39 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Sadness | 71 % | 63 % | 60 % | 40 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Tension | 64 % | 43 % | 41 % | 48 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Tension | 57 % | 30 % | 30 % | 53 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Tension | 57 % | 31 % | 31 % | 53 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 85′ | Tension | 62 % | 38 % | 38 % | 49 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 90′ | Sadness | 68 % | 49 % | 49 % | 46 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 95′ | Tension | 67 % | 47 % | 47 % | 52 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Details
- Directed by
- Geeta Gandbhir
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 2025
- Runtime
- 97 min
- Country
- United States of America
- Genres
- Thriller, Documentary, Crime
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Disturbing
- Data updated
Where to watch
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
