Bye Bye Birdie
1963 · 112 min · Director: George Sidney
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A singer goes to a small town for a performance before he is drafted.
Emotional fingerprint
Bye Bye Birdie (1963) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 35%, Smile 25%, Excitement 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor35%
- Smile25%
- Excitement20%
- Love10%
- Nostalgia10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Smile, Excitement. Genres: Comedy, Music. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Smile and Excitement. Its IMDb rating of 6.6/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 69/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Joy
- Excitement
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Excitement
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Joy | Excitement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Excitement | 52 % | 37 % | 25 % | 40 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Humor | 54 % | 45 % | 34 % | 39 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Humor | 54 % | 48 % | 35 % | 30 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Love | 55 % | 44 % | 33 % | 29 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Excitement | 60 % | 45 % | 41 % | 45 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 31′ | Humor | 64 % | 53 % | 46 % | 56 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 36′ | Humor | 64 % | 59 % | 40 % | 51 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 42′ | Humor | 60 % | 57 % | 35 % | 40 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Humor | 60 % | 48 % | 40 % | 31 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 53′ | Love | 63 % | 36 % | 46 % | 21 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 59′ | Joy | 63 % | 43 % | 41 % | 16 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Humor | 61 % | 54 % | 26 % | 23 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Humor | 61 % | 45 % | 30 % | 39 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Joy | 63 % | 35 % | 48 % | 50 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Humor | 57 % | 39 % | 40 % | 41 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Humor | 55 % | 44 % | 30 % | 33 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Love | 59 % | 48 % | 32 % | 35 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Humor | 63 % | 55 % | 33 % | 44 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 104′ | Humor | 69 % | 60 % | 44 % | 46 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 109′ | Love | 72 % | 57 % | 57 % | 35 % |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Bye Bye Birdie. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Maestro Borov
Randolph McAfee
Himself
Ballet Manager
Ursula
Mayor's Wife
Bartender
Ursula's Mother
Details
- Directed by
- George Sidney
- Written by
- Michael Stewart, Lee Adams, Irving Brecher
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1963
- Runtime
- 112 min
- Country
- United States of America
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
