To Sir, with Love
1967 · 105 min · Director: James Clavell
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A British Guianese engineer starts a job as a high school teacher in London’s East End, where his uninterested and delinquent pupils are in desperate need of attention and care.
Emotional fingerprint
To Sir, with Love (1967) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Inspiration 31%, Love 22%, Humor 18%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Inspiration31%
- Love22%
- Humor18%
- Hope16%
- Satisfaction13%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Inspiration, Love, Humor. Genres: Drama. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Inspiration, Love and Humor. Its IMDb rating of 7.6/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 72/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Joy
- Empathy
- Sadness
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Joy
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Joy | Empathy | Sadness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Joy | 37 % | 23 % | 25 % | 15 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Humor | 33 % | 16 % | 19 % | 8 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 13′ | Humor | 31 % | 13 % | 18 % | 4 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 18′ | Humor | 35 % | 10 % | 21 % | 9 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Tension | 44 % | 5 % | 25 % | 14 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 29′ | Tension | 51 % | 4 % | 27 % | 13 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Tension | 48 % | 11 % | 23 % | 6 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Humor | 41 % | 21 % | 20 % | 3 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Humor | 43 % | 30 % | 28 % | 9 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 50′ | Joy | 45 % | 38 % | 33 % | 15 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 55′ | Joy | 43 % | 38 % | 32 % | 10 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 60′ | Joy | 48 % | 26 % | 36 % | 9 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Tension | 63 % | 10 % | 48 % | 28 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Sadness | 68 % | 4 % | 57 % | 48 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Empathy | 60 % | 11 % | 55 % | 44 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 81′ | Empathy | 55 % | 20 % | 46 % | 29 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 87′ | Tension | 56 % | 25 % | 44 % | 18 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Empathy | 59 % | 39 % | 46 % | 13 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 97′ | Joy | 68 % | 57 % | 54 % | 21 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 102′ | Joy | 78 % | 67 % | 65 % | 35 % |
Cinderella
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Barbara 'Babs' Pegg
Miss Wong
Moira Joseph
Florian
Mrs. Joseph
Euphemia Phillips
Josie Dawes
Mr. Bell
Ingham
Schoolgirl
Details
- Directed by
- James Clavell
- Written by
- E.R. Braithwaite, James Clavell
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1967
- Runtime
- 105 min
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Genres
- Drama
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Inspiration
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
