Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow
1963 · 119 min · Director: Vittorio De Sica
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Three tales of very different women using their sexuality as a means to getting what they want.
Emotional fingerprint
Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow (1963) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 35%, Smile 25%, Love 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Humor35%
- Smile25%
- Love20%
- Surprise10%
- Satisfaction10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Smile, Love. Genres: Comedy, Romance. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Smile and Love. Its IMDb rating of 7.2/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 73/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Humor
- Relief
- Love
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Love
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Humor | Relief | Love |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Humor | 50 % | 45 % | 23 % | 5 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Relief | 53 % | 48 % | 33 % | 14 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Humor | 50 % | 45 % | 25 % | 23 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Humor | 48 % | 43 % | 11 % | 23 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Humor | 50 % | 45 % | 6 % | 18 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Humor | 57 % | 46 % | 9 % | 20 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Empathy | 65 % | 40 % | 29 % | 30 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Relief | 63 % | 36 % | 49 % | 31 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Relief | 54 % | 34 % | 38 % | 33 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Love | 53 % | 29 % | 15 % | 45 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Love | 56 % | 36 % | 8 % | 45 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Humor | 55 % | 48 % | 8 % | 33 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 74′ | Humor | 51 % | 49 % | 5 % | 29 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Humor | 55 % | 51 % | 4 % | 29 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 86′ | Humor | 60 % | 56 % | 6 % | 25 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 92′ | Humor | 59 % | 53 % | 13 % | 21 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 98′ | Empathy | 56 % | 45 % | 20 % | 19 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 104′ | Humor | 56 % | 49 % | 29 % | 19 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 110′ | Humor | 60 % | 59 % | 35 % | 23 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 116′ | Humor | 62 % | 62 % | 28 % | 25 % |
Rags to riches
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Kadri — your film companion
AIAsk anything about Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. From the film’s own dialogue and FeelDB data, at your spoiler level.
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Giorgio Ferrario
Umberto
Grandfather
Details
- Directed by
- Vittorio De Sica
- Written by
- Eduardo De Filippo, Cesare Zavattini, Billa Billa
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1963
- Runtime
- 119 min
- Country
- France, Italy
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
