Catch-22
1970 · 121 min · Director: Mike Nichols
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A WWII military pilot makes a valiant effort to be certified insane in order to be excused from flying missions. But there's a catch.
Emotional fingerprint
Catch-22 (1970) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Humor 30%, Confusion 25%, Tension 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Humor, Confusion, Tension. Genres: Comedy, War. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Humor, Confusion and Tension. Its IMDb rating of 7.1/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 71/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Disturbing
- Sadness
- Tension
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Humor
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Hope
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Disturbing | Sadness | Tension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Tension | 43 % | 22 % | 10 % | 38 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Tension | 53 % | 28 % | 11 % | 41 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Humor | 59 % | 31 % | 16 % | 43 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 21′ | Tension | 64 % | 35 % | 24 % | 49 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 27′ | Humor | 56 % | 24 % | 15 % | 34 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 33′ | Humor | 46 % | 16 % | 5 % | 23 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Tension | 44 % | 23 % | 5 % | 32 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 45′ | Tension | 48 % | 28 % | 6 % | 36 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Humor | 54 % | 31 % | 13 % | 36 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Tension | 56 % | 34 % | 30 % | 40 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 64′ | Sadness | 59 % | 35 % | 44 % | 43 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 70′ | Humor | 61 % | 36 % | 46 % | 40 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 76′ | Sadness | 66 % | 44 % | 55 % | 41 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 82′ | Sadness | 75 % | 60 % | 66 % | 56 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 88′ | Sadness | 84 % | 76 % | 70 % | 66 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 94′ | Disturbing | 89 % | 85 % | 70 % | 65 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 100′ | Disturbing | 89 % | 85 % | 70 % | 70 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 106′ | Tension | 84 % | 72 % | 66 % | 71 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 112′ | Hope | 80 % | 60 % | 63 % | 65 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 118′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence | Not enough subtitle evidence |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Dreedle's WAC
Snowden
Cathcart's Receptionist
Details
- Directed by
- Mike Nichols
- Written by
- Buck Henry, Joseph Heller
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1970
- Runtime
- 121 min
- Country
- United States of America
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Humor
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
