Hardcore
1979 · 108 min · Director: Paul Schrader
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
A conservative Midwest businessman ventures into the sordid underworld of pornography in search of his runaway teenage daughter who’s making hardcore films in the pits of Los Angeles.
Emotional fingerprint
Hardcore (1979) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Anxiety 35%, Empathy 25%, Fear 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Anxiety, Empathy, Fear. Genres: Drama, Mystery, Crime. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Anxiety, Empathy and Fear. Its IMDb rating of 7.1/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 73/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Sadness
- Empathy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Sadness | Empathy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Empathy | 27 % | 2 % | 8 % | 15 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 8′ | Not enough subtitle evidence | 27 % | 11 % | 7 % | 14 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 14′ | Curiosity | 37 % | 30 % | 16 % | 24 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 19′ | Empathy | 53 % | 46 % | 36 % | 42 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 24′ | Sadness | 62 % | 52 % | 47 % | 49 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Disturbing | 57 % | 46 % | 36 % | 39 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 35′ | Tension | 46 % | 39 % | 24 % | 28 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 41′ | Curiosity | 44 % | 37 % | 23 % | 27 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Tension | 45 % | 36 % | 21 % | 26 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 51′ | Curiosity | 39 % | 29 % | 13 % | 20 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Curiosity | 42 % | 33 % | 12 % | 19 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 62′ | Disturbing | 51 % | 39 % | 14 % | 24 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 68′ | Curiosity | 48 % | 30 % | 15 % | 26 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 73′ | Curiosity | 47 % | 32 % | 18 % | 32 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 78′ | Tension | 60 % | 51 % | 28 % | 40 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Disturbing | 69 % | 62 % | 32 % | 39 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 89′ | Tension | 71 % | 66 % | 29 % | 35 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 95′ | Tension | 79 % | 74 % | 46 % | 53 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 100′ | Sadness | 81 % | 63 % | 64 % | 69 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 105′ | Sadness | 73 % | 35 % | 61 % | 66 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Beatrice
Kristen VanDorn
Joe VanDorn
Jism Jim
Big Dick Blaque
Stud #1
Stud #2
Jim Rucker
Details
- Directed by
- Paul Schrader
- Written by
- Paul Schrader
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1979
- Runtime
- 108 min
- Country
- United States of America
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Anxiety
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
