Swamp Thing
1982 · 91 min · Director: Wes Craven
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
Mutated by his own secret formula, Dr. Alec Holland becomes Swamp Thing; a half-human, half-plant superhero who will stop at nothing to rescue government agent Alice Cable and defeat his evil arch nemesis...Even if it costs him his life.
Emotional fingerprint
Swamp Thing (1982) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Excitement 30%, Fear 25%, Awe 18%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Excitement30%
- Fear25%
- Awe18%
- Love15%
- Tension12%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Excitement, Fear, Awe. Genres: Horror, Sci-Fi. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Excitement, Fear and Awe. Its IMDb rating of 5.3/10 suggests a mixed audience reception; consider how well the emotional profile suits you. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 56/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Fear
- Curiosity
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Curiosity
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Relief
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Fear | Curiosity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 2′ | Curiosity | 37 % | 28 % | 17 % | 35 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 7′ | Curiosity | 39 % | 26 % | 16 % | 40 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 11′ | Curiosity | 45 % | 28 % | 15 % | 46 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 16′ | Curiosity | 56 % | 40 % | 24 % | 49 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 20′ | Tension | 68 % | 61 % | 46 % | 39 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 25′ | Tension | 77 % | 76 % | 66 % | 26 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 30′ | Tension | 76 % | 75 % | 65 % | 28 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Tension | 66 % | 65 % | 48 % | 35 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 39′ | Tension | 64 % | 64 % | 43 % | 34 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 43′ | Tension | 66 % | 65 % | 46 % | 27 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 48′ | Tension | 66 % | 64 % | 45 % | 24 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Tension | 73 % | 71 % | 51 % | 26 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 57′ | Tension | 74 % | 73 % | 53 % | 31 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 61′ | Empathy | 68 % | 64 % | 43 % | 29 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 66′ | Tension | 68 % | 64 % | 41 % | 30 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Tension | 69 % | 65 % | 43 % | 45 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 75′ | Curiosity | 69 % | 64 % | 43 % | 49 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 80′ | Tension | 73 % | 70 % | 51 % | 31 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 84′ | Tension | 74 % | 58 % | 41 % | 18 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 89′ | Relief | 73 % | 30 % | 17 % | 15 % |
Man in a hole
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Jude
Arcane's Messenger
Young Agent
Commando
Little Bruno
Details
- Directed by
- Wes Craven
- Written by
- Wes Craven
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1982
- Runtime
- 91 min
- Country
- United States of America
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Excitement
- Data updated
Where to watch
Subscription
Free
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
