The Hill
1965 · 123 min · Director: Sidney Lumet
Show plot summary (may contain spoilers)
North Africa, World War II. British soldiers on the brink of collapse push beyond endurance to struggle up a brutal incline. It's not a military objective. It's The Hill, a manmade instrument of torture, a tower of sand seared by a white-hot sun. And the troops' tormentors are not the enemy, but their own comrades-at-arms.
Emotional fingerprint
The Hill (1965) — Movie. Top emotional signals: Tension 35%, Disturbing 25%, Anger 20%. Source: AI estimate. Shares describe emotional signal, not percentages of people. Your experience may differ. How we measure
- Tension35%
- Disturbing25%
- Anger20%
- Sadness10%
- Empathy10%
AI estimate · no viewer votes yet
How we measure
AI estimate
Share of emotional signal, not the percentage of people or a probability of enjoyment.
Each viewer contributes one response, split equally across their selected emotions. When available, an automated estimate supplies a prior that is blended with those responses. Counts include distinct viewers, not automated estimates or archived anonymous votes. Fewer than 3 viewers is an early estimate; more responses do not guarantee certainty.
Why it feels this way
The strongest emotional signals are Tension, Disturbing, Anger. Genres: Drama, War. AI estimate.
Is it worth watching?
Consider this title if you are looking for Tension, Disturbing and Anger. Its IMDb rating of 7.8/10 suggests a generally positive audience reception. For these leading emotions, its Feel Score is 75/100.
How did it make you feel?
Votes are saved to the fingerprint once you’re signed in.
Pick up to three · 0/3
Emotional journey
- Tension
- Disturbing
- Empathy
Not enough subtitle evidence
No dominant emotion
Dominant emotion: Tension
Dominant emotion: Empathy
Dominant emotion: Sadness
Dominant emotion: Disturbing
Dominant emotion
| % | Approximate minute | Dominant emotion | Overall intensity | Tension | Disturbing | Empathy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 % | ≈ 3′ | Tension | 43 % | 38 % | 25 % | 22 % |
| 7.5 % | ≈ 9′ | Tension | 45 % | 40 % | 29 % | 23 % |
| 12.5 % | ≈ 15′ | Tension | 45 % | 40 % | 31 % | 25 % |
| 17.5 % | ≈ 22′ | Tension | 46 % | 43 % | 34 % | 30 % |
| 22.5 % | ≈ 28′ | Tension | 48 % | 44 % | 34 % | 35 % |
| 27.5 % | ≈ 34′ | Empathy | 51 % | 45 % | 35 % | 40 % |
| 32.5 % | ≈ 40′ | Tension | 57 % | 51 % | 41 % | 43 % |
| 37.5 % | ≈ 46′ | Tension | 60 % | 53 % | 48 % | 46 % |
| 42.5 % | ≈ 52′ | Empathy | 60 % | 50 % | 49 % | 51 % |
| 47.5 % | ≈ 58′ | Tension | 65 % | 56 % | 51 % | 59 % |
| 52.5 % | ≈ 65′ | Empathy | 76 % | 64 % | 61 % | 70 % |
| 57.5 % | ≈ 71′ | Sadness | 81 % | 64 % | 66 % | 70 % |
| 62.5 % | ≈ 77′ | Sadness | 79 % | 68 % | 61 % | 60 % |
| 67.5 % | ≈ 83′ | Tension | 79 % | 75 % | 58 % | 54 % |
| 72.5 % | ≈ 89′ | Tension | 81 % | 79 % | 64 % | 57 % |
| 77.5 % | ≈ 95′ | Tension | 84 % | 81 % | 75 % | 66 % |
| 82.5 % | ≈ 101′ | Disturbing | 80 % | 76 % | 73 % | 66 % |
| 87.5 % | ≈ 108′ | Tension | 73 % | 68 % | 59 % | 59 % |
| 92.5 % | ≈ 114′ | Tension | 75 % | 71 % | 59 % | 55 % |
| 97.5 % | ≈ 120′ | Tension | 82 % | 80 % | 68 % | 55 % |
Riches to rags
Rags to riches: The emotional tone rises from negative to positive.
Riches to rags: The emotional tone falls from positive to negative.
Man in a hole: The tone falls, then recovers.
Icarus: The tone rises, then falls.
Cinderella: The tone rises, falls, then rises again.
Oedipus: The tone falls, rises, then falls again.
AI reading of the film’s English subtitles (dialogue and sound cues) — not viewer votes. How we measure ↗
Afterward Reveal viewer responses · may contain spoilers
Viewer responses about feelings after the title ended, separate from feelings while watching. No AI estimates.
0 responses so far
Feeling details appear after at least 3 viewers respond, to protect privacy.
Cast
Details
- Directed by
- Sidney Lumet
- Written by
- Ray Rigby
- Type
- Movies
- Released
- 1965
- Runtime
- 123 min
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Ratings
- Feels mostly
- Tension
- Data updated
Where to watch
Rent
Feels similar
More like this →Emotion overlap shows mood similarity, not a prediction of enjoyment.
